## Context
Field metadata service was reusing validators from
validate-**OBJECT**-metadata-input which were throwing ObjectMetadata
exceptions not handled in fieldMetadataGraphqlApiExceptionHandler and
were going to Sentry.
To solve the issue since this validator is associated with both fields
and objects I'm moving the util to the root utils folder of metadata
module and throwing a common metadata user input exception
# Introduction
This PR contains several SNAPSHOT files explaining big +
While refactoring the Object Model settings page in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10653, encountered a critical
issue when submitting either one or both names with `""` empty string
hard corrupting a workspace.
This motivate this PR reviewing server side validation
I feel like we could share zod schema between front and back
## Refactored server validation
What to expect from Names:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Contains only a-z A-Z and 0-9
- Follows camelCase
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
What to expect from Labels:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive ( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10694
## Creation integrations tests
Created new integrations tests, following
[EachTesting](https://jestjs.io/docs/api#testeachtablename-fn-timeout)
pattern and uses snapshot to assert errors message. These tests cover
several failing use cases and started to implement ones for the happy
path but object metadata item deletion is currently broken unless I'm
mistaken @Weiko is on it
## Notes
- [ ] As we've added new validation rules towards names and labels we
should scan db in order to standardize existing values using either a
migration command or manual check
- [ ] Will review in an other PR the update path, adding integrations
tests and so on
## Context
Following the strategy where we want to block custom object creation
when the type is reserved by core objects. The issue happened again with
the recently introduced role table.
## Context
In some CustomException exceptions, we were instantiating a code without
initializing it which was overriding the parent code and it was then
lost when retrieving it in filters.
Removing them to make sure we don't reproduce this pattern
## Context
All objects have '...duplicates' resolver but only companies and people
have duplicate criteria (hard coded constant).
Gql schema and resolver should be created only if duplicate criteria
exist.
## Solution
- Add a new @WorkspaceDuplicateCriteria decorator at object level,
defining duplicate criteria for given object.
- Add a new duplicate criteria field in ObjectMetadata table
- Update schema and resolver building logic
- Update front requests for duplicate check (only for object with
criteria defined)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9828
More progress on translations:
- Migrate from translations.io to crowdin
- Optimize performance and robustness
- Set workspaceMember/user locale upon signup
Adding SettingsPermissionsGuard to execute permission check.
The guard is added directly in resolver, either at resolver level (ex:
roles) or resolver-endpoint level (ex: metadata). this can be challenged
!
Fortunately we're not using NODE_ENV=production for our deployment, but
we need to think of a better long-term fix. Not easy because Lingui
strips out messages in production environment
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/295
Based on the feature-flag `IsNewRelationEnabled` the schema will be
marked as outdated and regenerated, this will cause an error on the
front-end on the first request on the following ones schema will be well
generated ans request will work.
Similar to ObjectMetadata translation
Also fixed an issue linked to the migration from `t` to `message`
helper: we're forced to rebuild the ID ourselves
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Removing labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId and
imageIdentifierFieldMetadataId that should not be part of
createObjectInput as they don't make sense for an object yet to create
and will break
- Added all usable composite field types on pet custom object
- Fixed missing createdBy on people and company seeds
- DEFAULT_SUBDOMAIN is now used for login (could be improved for multi
workspace)
- Refactored ObjectMetadataStandardIdToIdMap to disambiguate from
ObjectMetadataMap
- Refactored seedCustomObjects
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8810
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5268
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8971
- Fixing Task/Note creation not sending position during creation
- Adding a command to backfill position being null, using existing
backfill command.
- Removed unused backfill job.
- Updated workspace entities to set position non-nullable and set a
default value to make it non-required on the API
- Updated position factory to set a default position for all objects
having a POSITION field instead of only company/people
- Moved the try/catch in each resolver factory calling
GraphqlQueryRunnerException handler, makes more sense to call it in the
actual graphql-query-runner and removing some duplicate codes
- Adding validations for input in QueryRunnerArgs factories
- Allow sync-metadata to override and sync defaultValues for certain
field types (that can't be updated by users)
- Removing health-check from sync-metadata command during force mode to
improve performances
## Context
The recent addition of object renaming introduced issues with enum
names. Enum names should follow the pattern
`${schemaName}.${tableName}_${columnName}_enum`. To address this, and to
allow users to customize the API name (which is included in the enum
name, columnName), this PR implements behavior similar to object
renaming by introducing a `isLabelSyncedWithName` boolean.
<img width="624" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 11 58 49"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/690fb71c-83f0-4922-80c0-946c92dacc30">
<img width="596" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 11 58 39"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/af9a0037-7cf5-40c3-9ed5-d51b340c8087">
## Context
Enum are named after this pattern
`${schema}_${tableName}_${columnName}_enum` however now that we allowed
table name update, we need to make sure their enums are renamed as well.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8760
## Context
Index names are based on table names and column names, which means
renaming an object (or a field) should also trigger a recompute of index
names. As of today it raises a bug where you can't create an object with
a name that was previously used.
I also took the occasion to refactor a bit the part where we create and
update (after renaming) relations. Basically the only relations we want
to affect are standard relations so I've aligned the logic with
sync-metadata which uses standardId as a source of truth to simplify the
code.
Note: We don't create index for custom relations
Next step should be to do that and update that code to update the index
name as well. Also note that we need to update the sync-metadata logic
for that as well
Currently when renaming an object, we execute
```
await this.fieldMetadataRepository
.findOneByOrFail({
name: existingObjectMetadata.nameSingular,
label: existingObjectMetadata.labelSingular,
objectMetadataId: relatedObject.id,
workspaceId: workspaceId,
})
```
to find the standard relation fields.
This would throw an error if the label solely was update beforehand
without updating the name too: in that case we will not have migrated
the label of the standard relation fields (which is maybe a mistake?
@Weiko wdyt?).
Let's remove it.
Refactoring update of standard relations when a custom object is
renamed, after observing occasional issues.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR adds "type" to the reserved keywords list in
validate-object-metadata-input.util.ts. This prevents users from
creating objects with "type" as a key, which has caused issues in the
past .
issue solved #8543
1.Updated the RESERVED_KEYWORDS array to include "type"
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
fix#8204
I changed "API keys" to "API values".
Stopped inputting special characters in Select field option keys.
@lucasbordeau please check the changes and tell me if I need to do any
other changes. :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
### Description
- This PR has as the base branch the TWNTY-5491 branch, but we also had
to include updates from the main branch, and currently, there are
conflicts in the TWNTY-5491, that cause errors on typescript in this PR,
so, we can update once the conflicts are resolved on the base branch,
but the functionality can be reviewed anyway
- We Implemented a new layout of object details settings and new, the
data is auto-saved in `Settings `tab of object detail
- There is no indication to the user that data are saved automatically
in the design, currently we are disabling the form
### Demo\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4198c0aa54b5450780a570ceee574838?sid=b4ef0a42-2d41-435f-9f5f-1b16816939f7>
### Refs
#TWNTY-5491
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
## Context
Latest refactoring broke the findOneWithinWorkspace method which is
called during object update, I'm simply reverting this change.
object-metadata-relation.service was naively computing a namePlural
based on the nameSingular while we already had that info in the DB...
Should fix some issues with renaming as well because the original field
was not computed with the right name.
## Context
ObjectMetadataService became quite large and handles too many
responsibilities. I'm trying to refactor a bit this part in preparation
of a larger work that will combine object-metadata services and
sync-metadata logic
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_ICONS that can be reused in relation
creation to refer to a standard object icon.
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELD_IDS that can be used with an object
name to get its standard field ids.
- Moved migration, record and relation creations to dedicated services,
refactored to improve performances and readability
- Refactored some validation logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR
1) (FE) fixing update of name not taken into account if toggle value is
changed in the same transaction
2) (BE) moving same nameSingular and namePlural validation before
effective update
By default, when custom fields are created, a searchVector field is
created based on the "name" field, which is also the label identifier by
default.
When this label identifier is updated, we want to update the
searchVector field to use this field as searchable field instead, if it
is of "searchable type" (today it is only possible to select a text or
number field as label identifier, while number fields are not
searchable).
Add support for indexes on composite fields and unicity constraint on
indexes
This pull request includes several changes across multiple files to
improve error handling, enforce unique constraints, and update database
migrations. The most important changes include updating error messages
for snack bars, adding a new command to enforce unique constraints, and
updating database migrations to include new fields and constraints.
### Error Handling Improvements:
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/error-handler/components/PromiseRejectionEffect.tsx`](diffhunk://#diff-e7dc05ced8e4730430f5c7fcd0c75b3aa723da438c26e0bef8130b614427dd9aL23-R23):
Updated error messages in `enqueueSnackBar` to use `error.message`
directly.
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-metadata/hooks/useFindManyObjectMetadataItems.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-74c126d6bc7a5ed6b63be994d298df6669058034bfbc367b11045f9f31a3abe6L44-R46):
Simplified error messages in `enqueueSnackBar`.
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-record/hooks/useFindDuplicateRecords.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-af23a1d99639a66c251f87473e63e2b7bceaa4ee4f70fedfa0fcffe5c7d79181L56-R58):
Simplified error messages in `enqueueSnackBar`.
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-record/hooks/useHandleFindManyRecordsError.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-da04296cbe280202a1eaf6b1244a30490d4f400411bee139651172c59719088eL22-R24):
Simplified error messages in `enqueueSnackBar`.
### New Command for Unique Constraints:
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/commands/upgrade-version/0-31/0-31-enforce-unique-constraints.command.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-8337096c8c80dd2619a5ba691ae5145101f8ae0368a75192a050047e8c6ab7cbR1-R159):
Added a new command to enforce unique constraints on company domain
names and person emails.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/commands/upgrade-version/0-31/0-31-upgrade-version.command.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR13-R14):
Integrated the new `EnforceUniqueConstraintsCommand` into the upgrade
process.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR13-R14)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR31)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR64-R68)
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/commands/upgrade-version/0-31/0-31-upgrade-version.module.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-da52814efc674c25ed55645f8ee2561013641a407f88423e705dd6c77b405527R7):
Registered the new `EnforceUniqueConstraintsCommand` in the module.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-da52814efc674c25ed55645f8ee2561013641a407f88423e705dd6c77b405527R7)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-da52814efc674c25ed55645f8ee2561013641a407f88423e705dd6c77b405527R24)
### Database Migrations:
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726757368824-migrationDebt.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-c450aeae7bc0ef4416a0ade2dc613ca3f688629f35d2a32f90a09c3f494febdcR1-R53):
Added a migration to update the `relationMetadata_ondeleteaction_enum`
and set default values.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726757368825-addIsUniqueToIndexMetadata.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-8f1e14bd7f6835ec2c3bb39bcc51e3c318a3008d576a981e682f4c985e746fbfR1-R19):
Added a migration to include the `isUnique` field in `indexMetadata`.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726762935841-addCompostiveColumnToIndexFieldMetadata.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-7c96b7276c7722d41ff31de23b2de4d6e09adfdc74815356ba63bc96a2669440R1-R19):
Added a migration to include the `compositeColumn` field in
`indexFieldMetadata`.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726766871572-addWhereToIndexMetadata.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-26651295a975eb50e672dce0e4e274e861f66feb1b68105eee5a04df32796190R1-R14):
Added a migration to include the `indexWhereClause` field in
`indexMetadata`.
### GraphQL Exception Handling:
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/api/graphql/workspace-query-runner/utils/workspace-query-runner-graphql-api-exception-handler.util.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-58445eb362dc89e31107777d39b592d7842d2ab09a223012ccd055da325270a8R1-R4):
Enhanced exception handling for `QueryFailedError` to provide more
specific error messages for unique constraint violations.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-58445eb362dc89e31107777d39b592d7842d2ab09a223012ccd055da325270a8R1-R4)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-58445eb362dc89e31107777d39b592d7842d2ab09a223012ccd055da325270a8R23-R59)
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/api/graphql/workspace-resolver-builder/factories/create-many-resolver.factory.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-233d58ab2333586dd45e46e33d4f07e04a4b8adde4a11a48e25d86985e5a7943L58-R58):
Updated the `workspaceQueryRunnerGraphqlApiExceptionHandler` call to
include context.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/api/graphql/workspace-resolver-builder/factories/create-one-resolver.factory.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-68b803f0762c407f5d2d1f5f8d389655a60654a2dd2394a81318655dcd44dc43L58-R58):
Updated the `workspaceQueryRunnerGraphqlApiExceptionHandler` call to
include context.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
Name shouldn't be added to all tables, especially standard objects
because they already have their own labelIdentifierFieldMetadata
specified in the workspace-entity schema. This PR removes this column
from the "base" list of columns to add when creating a new object/table
and moves it to the object-metadata service that is, as of today, only
used for custom objects. Also had to modify the migration-runner to
handle column creation in a table creation migration (this was available
in the migration definition already but was not doing anything)
This also fixes an issue in standard objects that already have a "name"
field defined with a different field type, this is even more important
when the said field is a composite field. For example people already has
a FULL_NAME name field which clashes with the default TEXT name field
meaning it was only creating 1 field metadata for 'name' but 3 columns
were created: `name, nameFirstName, nameLastName`. This inconsistency
with metadata (which is our source of truth everywhere) brought some
issues (lately, converting back typeorm response to gql (including
composition) was broken).
Steps to test
1. Run metadata migrations
2. Run sync-metadata on your workspace
3. Enable the following feature flags:
IS_SEARCH_ENABLED
IS_QUERY_RUNNER_TWENTY_ORM_ENABLED
IS_WORKSPACE_MIGRATED_FOR_SEARCH
4. Type Cmd + K and search anything