Fixes#10793
This PR is a work in progress.
**Still left to fix:**
- [x] When disabling synchronization of labels / api names, the edited
labels should be set to the English version. Currently the client just
send the localized versions together with the `isLabelSyncedWithName`
change. Could be an easy fix.
- [ ] Sometimes flipping the switch don't trigger the update function,
may be a regression as it seems to affect the custom objects too.
- [ ] There is a frontend problem where the labels inputs don't reflect
the changes made. When enabling back synchronisation after editing
labels, they are correctly back to their base values (backend,
navigation breadcrumb, etc) but the label inputs still have the old
values (switching pages will put them back to normal). I suspect this
could be linked to the above problem.
- [ ] API names are still displayed for standard objects per (kept them
for debugging, trivial fix)
- [ ] `SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm` have a `disableEdition`
parameter which is now used only for a few fields, not sure if it's
worth keeping because it's a bit misleading since it doesn't "disable"
much?
- [ ] I don't know what these do, but I have seen "Remote" object types.
Not sure if they work with my patch or not (I don't know how to test
them)
- [ ] Make it work with metadata synchronisation
**What should work:**
- Disabling synchronization of standard objects should work, label
inputs should no longer be disabled
- Modifying labels should work
- Enabling back synchronization should reset back the labels to the base
value and disable the label inputs again (minus the mentioned display
bug)
- The synchronisation switch should still work as expected for custom
objects
- Creating custom objects should still work (it uses the same form)
---------
Signed-off-by: AFCMS <afcm.contact@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
## Context
- Removing search* integration tests instead of fixing them because they
will be replaced by global search very soon
- Fixed billing + add missing seeds to make them work
- Fixed integration tests not using consistently the correct "test" db
- Fixed ci not running the with-db-reset configuration due to nx
configuration being used twice for different level of the command
- Enriched .env.test
- Fixed parts where exceptions were not thrown properly and not caught
by exception handler to convert to 400 when needed
- Refactored feature flag service that had 2 different implementations
in lab and admin panel + added tests
- Fixed race condition when migrations are created at the same timestamp
and doing the same type of operation, in this case object deletion could
break because table could be deleted earlier than its relations
- Fixed many integration tests that were not up to date since the CI has
been broken for a while
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
## Context
Field metadata service was reusing validators from
validate-**OBJECT**-metadata-input which were throwing ObjectMetadata
exceptions not handled in fieldMetadataGraphqlApiExceptionHandler and
were going to Sentry.
To solve the issue since this validator is associated with both fields
and objects I'm moving the util to the root utils folder of metadata
module and throwing a common metadata user input exception
# Introduction
This PR contains several SNAPSHOT files explaining big +
While refactoring the Object Model settings page in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10653, encountered a critical
issue when submitting either one or both names with `""` empty string
hard corrupting a workspace.
This motivate this PR reviewing server side validation
I feel like we could share zod schema between front and back
## Refactored server validation
What to expect from Names:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Contains only a-z A-Z and 0-9
- Follows camelCase
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
What to expect from Labels:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive ( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10694
## Creation integrations tests
Created new integrations tests, following
[EachTesting](https://jestjs.io/docs/api#testeachtablename-fn-timeout)
pattern and uses snapshot to assert errors message. These tests cover
several failing use cases and started to implement ones for the happy
path but object metadata item deletion is currently broken unless I'm
mistaken @Weiko is on it
## Notes
- [ ] As we've added new validation rules towards names and labels we
should scan db in order to standardize existing values using either a
migration command or manual check
- [ ] Will review in an other PR the update path, adding integrations
tests and so on
## Context
Following the strategy where we want to block custom object creation
when the type is reserved by core objects. The issue happened again with
the recently introduced role table.
## Context
In some CustomException exceptions, we were instantiating a code without
initializing it which was overriding the parent code and it was then
lost when retrieving it in filters.
Removing them to make sure we don't reproduce this pattern
## Context
All objects have '...duplicates' resolver but only companies and people
have duplicate criteria (hard coded constant).
Gql schema and resolver should be created only if duplicate criteria
exist.
## Solution
- Add a new @WorkspaceDuplicateCriteria decorator at object level,
defining duplicate criteria for given object.
- Add a new duplicate criteria field in ObjectMetadata table
- Update schema and resolver building logic
- Update front requests for duplicate check (only for object with
criteria defined)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9828
More progress on translations:
- Migrate from translations.io to crowdin
- Optimize performance and robustness
- Set workspaceMember/user locale upon signup
Adding SettingsPermissionsGuard to execute permission check.
The guard is added directly in resolver, either at resolver level (ex:
roles) or resolver-endpoint level (ex: metadata). this can be challenged
!
Fortunately we're not using NODE_ENV=production for our deployment, but
we need to think of a better long-term fix. Not easy because Lingui
strips out messages in production environment
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/295
Based on the feature-flag `IsNewRelationEnabled` the schema will be
marked as outdated and regenerated, this will cause an error on the
front-end on the first request on the following ones schema will be well
generated ans request will work.
Similar to ObjectMetadata translation
Also fixed an issue linked to the migration from `t` to `message`
helper: we're forced to rebuild the ID ourselves
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Removing labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId and
imageIdentifierFieldMetadataId that should not be part of
createObjectInput as they don't make sense for an object yet to create
and will break
- Added all usable composite field types on pet custom object
- Fixed missing createdBy on people and company seeds
- DEFAULT_SUBDOMAIN is now used for login (could be improved for multi
workspace)
- Refactored ObjectMetadataStandardIdToIdMap to disambiguate from
ObjectMetadataMap
- Refactored seedCustomObjects
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8810
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5268
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8971
- Fixing Task/Note creation not sending position during creation
- Adding a command to backfill position being null, using existing
backfill command.
- Removed unused backfill job.
- Updated workspace entities to set position non-nullable and set a
default value to make it non-required on the API
- Updated position factory to set a default position for all objects
having a POSITION field instead of only company/people
- Moved the try/catch in each resolver factory calling
GraphqlQueryRunnerException handler, makes more sense to call it in the
actual graphql-query-runner and removing some duplicate codes
- Adding validations for input in QueryRunnerArgs factories
- Allow sync-metadata to override and sync defaultValues for certain
field types (that can't be updated by users)
- Removing health-check from sync-metadata command during force mode to
improve performances
## Context
The recent addition of object renaming introduced issues with enum
names. Enum names should follow the pattern
`${schemaName}.${tableName}_${columnName}_enum`. To address this, and to
allow users to customize the API name (which is included in the enum
name, columnName), this PR implements behavior similar to object
renaming by introducing a `isLabelSyncedWithName` boolean.
<img width="624" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 11 58 49"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/690fb71c-83f0-4922-80c0-946c92dacc30">
<img width="596" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 11 58 39"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/af9a0037-7cf5-40c3-9ed5-d51b340c8087">
## Context
Enum are named after this pattern
`${schema}_${tableName}_${columnName}_enum` however now that we allowed
table name update, we need to make sure their enums are renamed as well.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8760
## Context
Index names are based on table names and column names, which means
renaming an object (or a field) should also trigger a recompute of index
names. As of today it raises a bug where you can't create an object with
a name that was previously used.
I also took the occasion to refactor a bit the part where we create and
update (after renaming) relations. Basically the only relations we want
to affect are standard relations so I've aligned the logic with
sync-metadata which uses standardId as a source of truth to simplify the
code.
Note: We don't create index for custom relations
Next step should be to do that and update that code to update the index
name as well. Also note that we need to update the sync-metadata logic
for that as well
Currently when renaming an object, we execute
```
await this.fieldMetadataRepository
.findOneByOrFail({
name: existingObjectMetadata.nameSingular,
label: existingObjectMetadata.labelSingular,
objectMetadataId: relatedObject.id,
workspaceId: workspaceId,
})
```
to find the standard relation fields.
This would throw an error if the label solely was update beforehand
without updating the name too: in that case we will not have migrated
the label of the standard relation fields (which is maybe a mistake?
@Weiko wdyt?).
Let's remove it.
Refactoring update of standard relations when a custom object is
renamed, after observing occasional issues.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR adds "type" to the reserved keywords list in
validate-object-metadata-input.util.ts. This prevents users from
creating objects with "type" as a key, which has caused issues in the
past .
issue solved #8543
1.Updated the RESERVED_KEYWORDS array to include "type"
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
fix#8204
I changed "API keys" to "API values".
Stopped inputting special characters in Select field option keys.
@lucasbordeau please check the changes and tell me if I need to do any
other changes. :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
### Description
- This PR has as the base branch the TWNTY-5491 branch, but we also had
to include updates from the main branch, and currently, there are
conflicts in the TWNTY-5491, that cause errors on typescript in this PR,
so, we can update once the conflicts are resolved on the base branch,
but the functionality can be reviewed anyway
- We Implemented a new layout of object details settings and new, the
data is auto-saved in `Settings `tab of object detail
- There is no indication to the user that data are saved automatically
in the design, currently we are disabling the form
### Demo\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4198c0aa54b5450780a570ceee574838?sid=b4ef0a42-2d41-435f-9f5f-1b16816939f7>
### Refs
#TWNTY-5491
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
## Context
Latest refactoring broke the findOneWithinWorkspace method which is
called during object update, I'm simply reverting this change.
object-metadata-relation.service was naively computing a namePlural
based on the nameSingular while we already had that info in the DB...
Should fix some issues with renaming as well because the original field
was not computed with the right name.
## Context
ObjectMetadataService became quite large and handles too many
responsibilities. I'm trying to refactor a bit this part in preparation
of a larger work that will combine object-metadata services and
sync-metadata logic
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_ICONS that can be reused in relation
creation to refer to a standard object icon.
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELD_IDS that can be used with an object
name to get its standard field ids.
- Moved migration, record and relation creations to dedicated services,
refactored to improve performances and readability
- Refactored some validation logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR
1) (FE) fixing update of name not taken into account if toggle value is
changed in the same transaction
2) (BE) moving same nameSingular and namePlural validation before
effective update
By default, when custom fields are created, a searchVector field is
created based on the "name" field, which is also the label identifier by
default.
When this label identifier is updated, we want to update the
searchVector field to use this field as searchable field instead, if it
is of "searchable type" (today it is only possible to select a text or
number field as label identifier, while number fields are not
searchable).
