### Introducing
- mock files in order to setup unit test on parsing outlook messages
- special spec files for development purposes : dev.spec files. They are
CI skipped with xdescribe but very useful for iterating on new messages
format
- main functionality : getMessages. We use microsoft default client to
do so, using the $batch endpoint to group calls by 20
### documentation
final touch to add troubleshooting tips
Implemented:
* Account Connect
* Calendar sync via delta ids then requesting single events
I think I would split the messaging part into a second pr - that's a
step more complex then the calendar :)
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
- Add message deletion and thread cleaning during full message list
fetch
- Add thread cleaning during partial message list fetch
- Delete provider from cache key
In this PR:
- removing ugprade-0.24 commands as we are releasing 0.30
- introducing cache:flush command
- refactoring upgrade command and sync-metadata command to use the
ActiveWorkspacesCommand so they consistently run on all workspaces or
selected workspaces
Fixes:
- clear localStorage on sign out
- fix missing workspaceMember in verify resolver
- do not throw on datasource already destroyed exception which can
happen with race condition when several resolvers are resolving in
parallel
Closes#6657
- Fix listeners
- Refactor jobs to take array of events
- Fix calendar events and messages deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
The goal is to replace pg_graphql with our own ORM wrapper (TwentyORM).
This PR tries to add some parsing logic to convert graphql requests to
send to the ORM to replace pg_graphql implementation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
As we grow, the messaging scripts are experiencing performance issues
forcing us to temporarily disable them on the cloud.
While investigating the performance, I have noticed that generating the
entity schema (for twentyORM) in the repository is taking ~500ms locally
on my Mac M2 so likely more on pods. Caching the entitySchema then!
I'm also clarifying naming around schemaVersion and cacheVersions ==>
both are renamed workspaceMetadataVersion and migrated to the workspace
table (the workspaceCacheVersion table is dropped).
- Remove `messageThreadId` from `messageChannelMessageAssociation`
- Update thread merging
- Update all queries which were dependent on this field
- Update some raw queries by using `twentyORM` instead
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#6255
- Move files from `messaging/common` into the correct module
- Remove common module between calendar and messaging
`calendar-messaging-participant-manager`
- Update and fix massaging and calendar participant matching
- Create `MatchParticipantModule`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
