@ehconitin following your question I did a quick refactoring of the show
page - we can push it much further but it would be better to start from
this code than from main
Edit: I will merge to avoid conflicts, this is very far from perfect but
still much better than the mess we had before
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fixed bug that was appearing with records without any activity target
The problem may come from the new TwentyORM that doesn't understand the
filter like before.
This PR Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6942
Other improvements :
- Fetch activities (note and task) title only when loading timeline, so
we don't always have a clickable title.
- Fixed IconButton width regression.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR Solves #6830
## Issue Summary
The tasks are grouped by their respective statuses and displayed on the
ui. The grouping is performed by `lodash.groupBy` which doesn't maintain
explicit ordering of the keys.
## Fix
Sort the tasks groups array by their status on the basis of
reverse-alphabetical order before generating task component for each
task data.
#### Why reverse alphabetical?
It implicitly sorts the statuses as per the order `TODO` ->
`IN_PROGRESS` -> `DONE`
Caveats:
1. Changing the name of one or more status might result in a different
unwanted order.
2. `null` is unhandled, although the original code doesn't allow for
nulls as status while displaying
### Alternative Fix
Maintain an explicit ordering of the statuses and sort the tasks
accordingly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
@lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
Issue #4826
Could u review this changes.
Let me know what do you think.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Issue #6630
It seems this bug is caused by `targetableObjects` being assigned an
empty array, which then leads to an error due to it being undefined.
I've made some changes that should address the issue, but I would
appreciate any feedback or suggestions on alternative solutions.
Please let me know if there is a better approach to resolving this.
Thank you!
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6409798-3320-49b3-834f-2b6888847ed8
Implement soft delete on standards and custom objects.
This is a temporary solution, when we drop `pg_graphql` we should rely
on the `softDelete` functions of TypeORM.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Remove raw queries and replace them by using `twentyORM`
- Refactor into services and utils
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Activity creation was duplicating the new activity on already visited
records of the same type.
The fix was to activate `shouldMatchRootQueryFilter` on createOne for
activity.
Fixes [#6335](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6335)
This pull request is for issue
[#6335](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6335): Refactor
RecordInlineCell tree with a Context to avoid props drilling. For the
refactoring, this PR made changes as below:
- Created new script RecordInlineCellContext.tsx: Defining a context to
pass in useContext()
- Updated RecordInlineCell.tsx: Passing the necessary props as context
values, wrapping with RecordInlineCellContext.Provider
- Updated RecordInlineCellContainer.tsx: Passing the props to
RecordInlineContainer as RecordInlineCellContext
- Updated RecordInlineCellDisplayMode.tsx: retrieves values from
useRecordInlineCellContext instead of directly assigning them
- RecordInlineCellValue.tsx: Removed values passed through
<RecordInlineCellDisplayMode> as they are now retrieved through
useRecordInlineCellContext + Removed the null check for
RecordInlineCellContextProps.
Using RecordInlineCellContext, I believe the context goes to the top of
the hierarchy and passed to the required layers without going through
several layers. However, please let me know if I understood the issue
incorrectly or it is not solved properly.
Thank you in advance for your review!
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
