- add to step output schema the information that field is a composite
sub field
- from output schema, when selecting the variable, copy all info
required to stepFilter
- from stepFilter, when selecting a value, display a special component
for composites
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13297
See SettingsDataModelFieldDateForm form validation which expects a
settings field to be present with a default display format. This PR adds
the missing initial value.
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This PR adds the ability to save an any field filter to a view.
It adds a new `anyFieldFilterValue` on both core view and workspace view
entities.
It also introduces the necessary utils that mimic the logic that manages
the save of record filters and record sorts on views.
This PR adds any field filter request generation utils with its unit
test.
It also calls this new util in the relevant requests for table and
board.
This PR also adds a new corresponding state in context store so that the
filter is handled in command menu and actions.
We also add this new filter to the aggregate queries.
The RecordShowPage story was also fixed.
Implementation is very simple
Established authentication dynamic is intercepted at
getAuthTokensFromLoginToken. If 2FA is required, a pattern similar to
EmailVerification is executed. That is, getAuthTokensFromLoginToken
mutation fails with either of the following errors:
1. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
2. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_PROVISION_REQUIRED
UI knows how to respond accordingly.
2FA provisioning occurs at the 2FA resolver.
2FA verification, currently only OTP, is handled by auth.resolver's
getAuthTokensFromOTP
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Baptiste Ronssin <65334819+jbronssin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
resolve#13168 , #8501
This PR fixes an issue where the onChange trigger was deleting all
attachments by removing the JWT token from their paths (if it existed)
and comparing the new body with the old body to identify deleted
attachments. It ensures that only attachments actually removed from the
body get deleted, preventing unintended deletion of attachments not
added directly through the body. It also handles updating attachment
names in the body so changes are reflected in Files, with related tests
updated accordingly.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8d824a24-b257-4794-942e-3b2dceb9907d
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- add fieldMetadataId to step output schema
- use it to display FormFieldInput in Filter input
- few fixes for a few fields
Next step:
- Handle composite fields
- Design review
In this PR:
- Open filters in the side panel for **workflows**
- Open filters in the side panel for **workflow versions**
- Preparation for opening filters in the side panel for **workflow
runs**
- Add many tests to increase the coverage
Remaining to do:
- Open filters in the side panel for **workflow runs**
- Upon filter creation, open it in the side panel
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR fixes a critical bug on record title cell opening when there was
no view loaded before.
This happened because the hook that opens the record title cell was
relying on a state that stored field definitions that were computed only
when a view was loaded.
Since there is no view on a record page, this wasn't working.
We should refactor field / column definitions so that they are always
derived from either view fields or an object metadata item's field
metadata items.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13347
## TODO
- [ ] add dropdown to use records from outside the context
- [x] add loader for files chip
- [x] add roleId where it's necessary
- [x] Split AvatarChip in two components. One with the icon that will
call the second with leftComponent.
- [ ] Fix tests
- [x] Fix UI regression on Search
Fixes - #13307
**Description**
This PR adds the feature to create view from the command menu
**Key Changes**
- Added the command in the DEAFULT_RECORD_ACTION_CONFIG
- Created a component which is used in the action when the command is
clicked
**Files Changed**
-
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/action-menu/actions/record-actions/constants/DefaultRecordActionsConfig.tsx
-
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/action-menu/actions/record-actions/no-selection/components/SeeDeletedRecordsNoSelectionRecordAction.tsx
-
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/action-menu/actions/record-actions/no-selection/types/NoSelectionRecordActionsKeys.ts
-
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/views/view-picker/components/ViewPickerListContent.tsx
**Demo Video**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8e3dc3dd-7f85-4da5-8c4a-6721abb29aff
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Closes#13277
## What I Did
- Enabled `multiple` attribute in the file input
- Updated the `handleFileChange` handler to loop through files
- Confirmed that each file is sent via `uploadAttachmentFile`
## Why
This change allows users to upload multiple files at once instead of
doing it one by one.
## Screenshot / Video (Optional)
[Screencast From 2025-07-18
23-58-36.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea191f25-1904-4643-afe2-7029785eebcb)
---
Let me know if you'd like any changes! 💪
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Fixes: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13110
I'm deprecating note.body and task.body to remove confusion between body
and bodyV2
What will be left but should be done later to avoid breaking changes:
- re-add a body field in the graphql API only that points to the same
bodyV2 field in SQL (need to be handled in fields and filter for note
and task)
- (wait some time)
- remove bodyV2 field
This PR adds the frontend logic to handle the user input of a search any
field value.
It also adds the associated feature flag, that can be modified from the
admin panel.
This PR does not add the filtering part nor the saving on view logic,
which will come in their separate PRs.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6a52c090-b957-46aa-bff7-a90b51109789
In this PR:
- Adjust the edges to match the new Figma design
- Properly display the filters for workflows and workflow versions
(replaced shouldDisplayEdgeOptions with isEdgeEditable as we want to
display configured filters on workflow versions, but want to disallow
editing them)
- Wrote a few tests to make coverage pass
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d303d338-1938-4efe-b489-5a530d65fb30
This PR does not produce any functional changes for our users. It
prepares the branches for workflows by:
- decommissioning `output` and `context` fields or `workflowRun` records
and use newly created `state` field from front-end and back-end
- use `stepStatus` computed by `back-end` in `front-end`
- add utils and types in `twenty-shared/workflow` (not completed, a
follow-up is scheduled
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1211)
- add concurrency to `workflowQueue` message queue to avoid weird branch
execution when using forms in workflow branches
- add a WithLock decorator for better dev experience of
`CacheLockService.withLock` usage
Here is an example of such a workflow running (front branch display is
not yet done that's why it looks ugly) ->
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1258024460238192691/1392897615171158098
This PR refactors fields draft value component state and old component
scoped states still left.
It does not refactor the persistField logic but it will allow it in a
next refactor.
We still have to refactor scoped state used as component states / family
states, not as old states.
This PR fixes a focus conflict with global hotkeys, mainly "?" that
opens the shortcut helper dialog.
This fix works but we should maybe think about a more generic approach
in another issue, like disabling global hotkeys when certain types of
components are open (input, dropdown, etc.)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13197
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated trigger labels across various components to use lowercase
formatting for consistency. This includes changes in the
WorkflowVisualizerPage, DatabaseTriggerDefaultLabel, and other related
files. The adjustments enhance readability and maintain a uniform style
throughout the application.
---------
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
This PR refactors the snackbar modules that was using legacy versions of
our state management.
We replace the old states with new ones and also the old scoped context
with component instance context.
This PR improves dropdown menu headers for filter and sort dropdown in
view bar and editable filter chips.
It adds what's necessary to navigate back or close the dropdown, so that
we don't rely solely on click outside to exit the dropdown.
This PR also refactors the components so that we clearly identify the
two code paths that can use filter dropdowns : view bar and filter chip,
everything that can be DRY stays in the object-filter-dropdown module
but we try to have our wrapping components in each distinct module
instead of blending everything with ternaries inside
object-filter-dropdown module.
The vector search input value wasn't correctly handled across the
different dropdowns, due to a wrong component instance management, since
the dropdown menu header improvement put this into light, I also
refactored the state management of the vector search input.
@Bonapara please check the QA video and tell me if it's ok, I didn't add
dropdown menu header on the advanced filter field list dropdown because
it's a select more than a standalone dropdown, what do you think ?
QA :
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/17080f32-f302-436c-937b-3577715b7e84
QA Vector search fix :
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6367bbf6-8a98-4b53-86cf-6ba92be130eb
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/640
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1206
Instead of initializing model at start time we do it at run time to be
able to swap model provider more easily.
Also introduce a third driver for openai-compatible providers, which
among other allows for local models with Ollama
This PR fixes two bugs :
- Some important push item to focus stack calls were setting global
hotkey conflicting keys to true (like open dropdown)
- Icon picker matrix items were broken
