This PR fixes a bug that happens when switching from an object to
another.
It is a temporary fix because it fixes a problem downstream, that
shouldn't happen, but it is tied to the new implementation of the main
context store.
We should find a way to have context store states defined earlier
because it might impact logic that was developed during the previous
months that didn't anticipated the state of current view id taking more
re-renders to be correctly set between page change / table change.
# Introduction
While importing records encountering missing expected fields when
writting a fragment from apollo cache
## Updates
### 1/ `createdBy` Default value
When inserting in cache in create single or many we will now make
optimistic behavior on the createdBy value
### 2/ `createRecordInCache` dynamically create `recordGrqlFields`
When creating an entry in cache, we will now dynamically generate fields
to be written in the fragment instead of expecting all of them. As by
nature record could be partial
### 3/ Strictly typed `RecordGqlFields`
# Conclusion
closes#9927
Introduce isCustomDomainEnabled field in Workspace entity to manage
custom domain activation. Update related services, types, and logic to
validate and toggle the custom domain's status dynamically based on its
current state. This ensures accurate domain configurations are reflected
across the system.
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
We are using useInView to detect if a row should be rendered or not.
# Behavior issue
When browsing an Index page (let's say People), then navigating to
another one (Company), then back to People, the rows were not displayed
anymore. For some reason the inView value was set to false in this case
# Fix
- I have updated the useInView (react-intersection-observer) package but
it did not fix it
- useInView provides a ref. However, I believe this was conflicting with
the draggableRef; cecause we are in a <table> we cannot add additional
containers and are forced to apply both refs to the <tr> (draggableRef +
inViewRef). I believe this was causing the issue. I have added the
inView ref to an empty <td> within the row which is achieving the same
goal without forcing to combine refs
Removed eslint disable comment from the index file and updated the
eslint ignore list to exclude the serverless driver index file. This
ensures the file is skipped during linting without unnecessary inline
comments.
This PR enforces objectMetadataItem to be passed to hook
useColumnDefinitionsFromFieldMetadata, which was never used without an
objectMetadataItem passed in parameters (and probably shouldn't anyway)
Removed the associated test that tested for an undefined
objectMetadataItem parameter in useColumnDefinitionsFromFieldMetadata.
This allows to remove the need to rely on recordIndexContext to retrieve
the filterableFieldMetadataItems.
- Rename `GetAuthorizationUrl` to `GetAuthorizationUrlForSSO`
- Move `GetAuthorizationUrlForSSO` from `sso.resolver.ts` to
`auth.resolver.ts` to avoid the permission guard and let users use an
SSO provider.
- Fix an issue in OIDC guard that breaks the connection if you have
multiple SSO providers + add tests for OIDC guard.
This PR essentially removes the usage of filterDefinition.type, by
replacing it with fieldMetadataItem.type derivation. Thus allowing to
completely remove filterDefinition later on.
In computeFilterRecordGqlOperationFilter, emptyOperationFilter is now
returned before going into the big switch case. This avoids repeating
the same exact call to getEmptyRecordGqlOperationFilter for each type.
Fixed some tests that need
getJestMetadataAndApolloMocksAndActionMenuWrapper to have record filters
properly working with the new implementation. We'll probably want to
refactor the record context store, record index context, etc.
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9772
In this PR:
- the root cause of the issue that the ContextStoreViewIdEffect was not
filtering the views on objectMetadata properly
- I'm also deleting some over complex in the latestVisited view logic
- Duplicated logic between ContextStoreViewIdEffect and
ViewBarViewIdEffect, see my comment
## Context
Introducing the "Permissions" tab in the role page
Next: Need to address some css improvements, some components might be
reusable and it still does not fully match the figma (icon missing for
permission types for example). We decided to merge like this for now so
we have something functional and I will update the code in an upcoming
PR
<img width="633" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-12 at 13 54 16"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/762db5d7-e0a6-4ee1-b299-24de6645bad1"
/>
## Context
We recently introduced a createMany on the field metadata service to
improve seeding performances. This broke relation metadata creation
because it was using a method with the same name that was inherited from
TypeOrmQueryService.
## Context
All objects have '...duplicates' resolver but only companies and people
have duplicate criteria (hard coded constant).
Gql schema and resolver should be created only if duplicate criteria
exist.
## Solution
- Add a new @WorkspaceDuplicateCriteria decorator at object level,
defining duplicate criteria for given object.
- Add a new duplicate criteria field in ObjectMetadata table
- Update schema and resolver building logic
- Update front requests for duplicate check (only for object with
criteria defined)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9828
This PR fixes a bug where setting an aggregate in the footer of a record
table makes the currentRecordFilters state being overwritten by the
view, which we don't want.
addressing >
There are two patterns to avoid:
Creating functions that return JSX like renderThing() -> this was taken
already addressed in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10011
Making a hook that "stores" all the logic of a component - > this PR is
addressing this particular pattern
In essence, handlers should remain in the component and be connected to
their events.
And everything in a handler can be abstracted into its dedicated hook.
For example:
const { myReactiveState } =
useRecoilValue(myReactiveStateComponentState);
const { removeThingFromOtherThing } = useRemoveThingFromOtherThing();
const handleClick = () => {
if (isDefined(myReactiveState)) {
removeThingFromOtherThing();
}
}
Broadly speaking, this is how you can split large components into
several sub-hooks.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
