This pull request introduces a new `FieldMetadataType` called `ACTOR`.
The primary objective of this new type is to add an extra column to the
following objects: `person`, `company`, `opportunity`, `note`, `task`,
and all custom objects.
This composite type contains three properties:
- `source`
```typescript
export enum FieldActorSource {
EMAIL = 'EMAIL',
CALENDAR = 'CALENDAR',
API = 'API',
IMPORT = 'IMPORT',
MANUAL = 'MANUAL',
}
```
- `workspaceMemberId`
- This property can be `undefined` in some cases and refers to the
member who created the record.
- `name`
- Serves as a fallback if the `workspaceMember` is deleted and is used
for other source types like `API`.
### Functionality
The pre-hook system has been updated to allow real-time argument
updates. When a record is created, a pre-hook can now compute and update
the arguments accordingly. This enhancement enables the `createdBy`
field to be populated with the correct values based on the
`authContext`.
The `authContext` now includes:
- An optional User entity
- An optional ApiKey entity
- The workspace entity
This provides access to the necessary data for the `createdBy` field.
In the GraphQL API, only the `source` can be specified in the
`createdBy` input. This allows the front-end to specify the source when
creating records from a CSV file.
### Front-End Handling
On the front-end, `orderBy` and `filter` are only applied to the name
property of the `ACTOR` composite type. Currently, we are unable to
apply these operations to the workspace member relation. This means that
if a workspace member changes their first name or last name, there may
be a mismatch because the name will differ from the new one. The name
displayed on the screen is based on the workspace member entity when
available.
### Missing Components
Currently, this PR does not include a `createdBy` value for the `MAIL`
and `CALENDAR` sources. These records are created in a job, and at
present, we only have access to the workspaceId within the job. To
address this, we should use a function similar to
`loadServiceWithContext`, which was recently removed from `TwentyORM`.
This function would allow us to pass the `authContext` to the jobs
without disrupting existing jobs.
Another PR will be created to handle these cases.
### Related Issues
Fixes issue #5155.
### Additional Notes
This PR doesn't include the migrations of the current records and views.
Everything works properly when the database is reset but this part is
still missing for now. We'll add that in another PR.
- There is a minor issue: front-end tests are broken since this commit:
[80c0fc7ff1).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR fixes two bugs:
- A broken link to the task page that had been left on the mobile
version
- On Kanban cards, the badge for notes/tasks wasn't properly displayed
because the title wasn't loaded from the backend
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:

Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:

Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:

How the chip looks in a message thread:

Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:

## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Implement date formatting per workspace member settings
We'll need another round to maybe initialize all workspaces on the
default settings.
For now the default behavior is to take system settings if nothing is
found in DB.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Closes#6431
- create new field `activationStatus`
- create migration commands
- add logic to update `activationStatus` on workspace activation and on
stripe subscriptionStatus change
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR, I am:
- removing a useEffect (we use the onCompleted prop of useFindManyQuery
hook)
- moving this logic into a RecordShowPageHeader to avoid re-renders of
the whole tree
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-4238](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-4238).
This ticket was imported from:
[TWNTY-4238](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/4238)
---
## Description
- We moved the filter from RecordIndexContainer to RecordBoardCard, this
change will fix the fix issue that the name column was not visible in
Kanban view and will keep the behavior in the Kanban card. The options
dropdown uses the same state that the card uses, but the name is
rendered on the card because, for the name field, the card uses another
data because the render of the name is different from the render of the
other fields, so we removed the filter in the state, but we need to
filter only in the card to avoid duplicated data, we could not find any
other case that this filter is useful for another component
- We updated the type in RecordBoardFieldDefinition to fix TS error in
RecordBoardCard file
### Demo
<https://jam.dev/c/7c9db8e1-9b53-49cf-a44c-0b0fec5b1988>
### Refs
- #4238Fixes#4238
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Adding support for all Composite Fields while using the "import"
functionality. This includes:
- Currency
- Address
Edit :
- Refactored a lot of types in the spreadsheet import module
- Renamed a lot of functions, hooks and types that were not
self-explanatory enough
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This pull request addresses an issue where the delete button, placed
closely to the export button, could lead to accidental deletions without
confirmation. The problem was that the confirmation modal for the delete
action, being the second action, was not displayed. The code was updated
to map all action bar entries and display their respective confirmation
modals correctly.
### Changes Made:
- Updated the rendering of action bar entries to ensure all confirmation
modals are shown.
Changed from displaying only the first action bar entry's confirmation
modal to mapping through all entries and displaying each modal if it
exists.
- Removed the delete from the onClick because it is present in the
onConfirmClick.
### Description
Resolves Issue: [https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6224](#6224)
### Additional Consideration
I have changed the default start rating value from 1 star to no star
since clicking on the selected start was reverting the filed to 1 star
which didn't seem like the appropriate behaviour. Let me know if this
change is fine
---------
Co-authored-by: JosephAshwin23 <joseph.sanjivi@anywhere.co>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
- Removed enabled props from useScopedHotkeys becayse it doesn't work
- Moved enter useScopedHotkeys in a handler that we drill down to the
text inputs on the settings form
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR aims to fix#6102
I think we should dicuss a bit about how we should manage the lenght and
set the variables globally
Edit :
@RobertoSimonini1 I used this PR to fix various problems that were left
unsolved :
- Refactor TextDisplay component, EllipsisDisplay was redundant with
OverflowingTextWithTooltip
- Removed maxWidth on TextDisplay for all other components, as it wasn't
the right way to do it, the parent container should be responsible for
width not the TextDisplay (code smell)
- Drilled-down isCentered to respect its intent in the RecordInlineCell
display of the record show page title
- Fixed RecordInlineCellEditMode so that the portal is well centered
above the record show page title
- Fixed DoubleTextInput width so that it expands normally and takes all
its parent available space.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fcdd5ca-4329-467c-ada8-4dd5d45be259">
Open questions:
- the Tag component does not match Figma in term of style and API for
"transparent" | "outline". We need to discuss with @Bonapara what is the
desired behavior here
- right now opportunity.stage is not nullable. We need to discuss with
@FelixMalfait and @Bonapara what we want here. I would advocate to make
a it nullable for now until we introduce settings on select fields.
custom select are nullable and it could be confusing for the user
Follow up:
- enhance tests on Tags
- add story to cover the No Value column on record board
Closes#5735.
The field probability on opportunity will -
- stop being created for new workspaces (after this PR is merged)
- have "isCustom" value set to true and be displayed as such in the
settings (after this PR is merged + sync-metadata is run on workspace)
- still show in the views (all the time)
This field is deprecated as a standard field but not replaced by another
one, so we are not adding the `(deprecated)` suffix in the label.
- Fixed activity creation in cache
- Fixed activity creation in DB, where the relation target was
disappearing after creation
- Added an option to match root query filter in creation optimistic
effect to avoid adding the newly created record in every mounted query
in Apollo cache on the same object (which was causing notes to be
duplicated on every object in the cache)
- Fixed tab list scope id
- Fixed various browser console warnings