In the BE we throw custom errors with precise error codes (e.g.
"LABEL_ALREADY_EXISTS") before catching them in filters and rethrowing
BaseGraphQLErrors (standard errors such as NotFoundError, UserInputError
etc.).
In the FE we were grouping sentries based on the error codes but we were
actually grouping by very broad codes such as "NOT_FOUND" or
"BAD_USER_INPUT", extracted from the BaseGraphQLErrors.
To fix that, we update the BaseGraphQLError constructor api to allow to
pass on the CustomError directly and retrieve from it the original code
and store it in existing property `subCode` that we will use in the FE
to send errors to sentry.
This new api also eases usage of `userFriendlyMessage` that is passed on
to the api response and therefore to the FE when CustomError is passed
on directly to the BaseGraphQLError constructor.
# Introduction
- Added `INDEX` action generation
- Refactored the naming, mainly `WorkspaceMigrationV2ObjectInput` ->
`FlattenObjectMetadata` and same for field. The transpilation will be
done above, agnostically of the workspace migration
Still need to:
- Create testing toolbox and follow each testing pattern for each
actions and make a complex one ( remove static current tests )
- Handle standard and custom edges cases
Notes:
`workspace-migration-v2/types` and `workspace-migration-v2/utils` could
be located outside of this folder, my hunch is that we will move them
once we work on flatten tranpilers
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12867
Issue:
when you have a variable `toto` which is: `Record<string, MyType>` and
you do toto['xxx'], this will be typed as `MyType` instead of `MyType |
undefined`
Solutions:
- activate `noUncheckedIndexedAccess` check in tsconfig, this is the
preferred solution but will take time to get there (this raises 600+
errors)
- use a Map: cf https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13125/files
- set the type to Partial<Record<string, MyType>>. Drawback is that when
you do Object.values(toto), you'll get `Array<MyType | undefined>`.
Hence why we have to filter these behind
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0a0bfed-c441-4e53-84c2-2da98ccbcf50"
/>
- update publishOneServerlessFunction so it does not break the workflow
if failing
- update upgrade documentation to update `docker-compose.yml` when
mutated
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13058
Large PR, sorry for that. Don't hesitate to reach me to have full
context (env. 500lines for integration and unit tests)
- Add connect logic in Workspace Entity Manager
- Update QueryDeepPartialEntity type to enable dev to use connect
- Add integration test on createOne / createMany
- Add unit test to cover main utils
- Remove feature flag on connect
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1148
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1147
I rebuilt the advanced filters used in views and workflow search for a
specific filter step.
Components structure remains the same, using `stepFilterGroups` and
`stepFilters`. But those filters are directly sent to backend.
Also re-using the same kind of states we use for advanced filters to
share the current filters used. And a context to share what's coming
from workflow props (function to update step settings and readonly)
⚠️ this PR only focusses on the content of the step. There is still a
lot to do on the filter icon behavior in the workflow
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8a6a76f0-11fa-444a-82b9-71fc96b18af4
This PR fixes a bug that happened when adding a field to a table right
after a field creation in the data model settings.
This happened because the backend adds the newly created field to all
relevant views without telling the frontend (because we don't have web
sockets yet), so the frontend ended up in a stale state, and when the
user added the field manually to a view the backend rightly threw an
error telling that the view field it already existed.
So the fix is just to refetch all views after a field creation, sparing
us the difficult work of manually updating the Apollo cache.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13071
In this PR
- introduction of fieldPermission entity
- addition of upsertFieldPermission in role resolver
- computing of permissions taking fieldPermission into account. In order
to limit what is stored in Redis we only store fields restrictions. For
instance for objectMetadata with id XXX with a restriction on field with
id YYY we store:
`"XXX":{"canRead":true,"canUpdate":false,"canSoftDelete":false,"canDestroy":false,"restrictedFields":{"YYY":{"canRead":false,"canUpdate":null}}}`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
## Expected behavior
Described behavior regarding: (update | create) x (custom | standard) x
(icon, label, name, isSynced)
**Custom:**
- Field RELATION create: name, label, isSynced, icon should be editable
- Field RELATION update: name should not, icon label, isSynced should
- For other fields, icon, label, name, isSynced should be editable at
field creation | update
To simplify: Field RELATION name should not be editable at update
**Standards**
- Field: create does not makes sense
- Field: name should not, icon label, isSynced should (this will end up
in overrides)
To simplify, no Field RELATION edge case, name should not be editable at
update
**Note:** the FE logic is quite different as the UI is hiding some
details behind the syncWithLabel. See my comments and TODO there
## What I've tested:
(update | create) x (custom | standard) x (icon, label, name, isSynced,
description)
This PR addresses feedback from
[PR-13061](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13061).
- Removed redundant type assertion from `apollo.factory.ts`.
- Removed redundant tests: Eliminated test cases that were specifically
added to boost coverage metrics rather than testing meaningful
functionality
This PR removes useDropdown barrel hook and refactors the legacy
useDropdown states to the last version of our recoil component state
management.
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Updates yarn to the latest version 4.9.2 (from 4.4.0).
Also removes the explicit `enableHardenedMode` from yarnrc as it
significantly slows down installation.
This is already enabled automatically for pull requests on Github, thus
preventing lockfile poisoning where it's relevant.
See <https://yarnpkg.com/features/security#hardened-mode>:
> in most cases you won't even have to think about it - the hardened
mode is enabled by default when Yarn detects it runs in a pull request
from a public GitHub repository.
It can additionally be enabled explicitly for specific CI jobs by using
an environment variable, if desired:
> The hardened mode can be set (or disabled) [...] by defining
`YARN_ENABLE_HARDENED_MODE=1|0` in your environment variables
If this is the case, yarn still recommends **not** enabling it
everywhere:
> **DANGER**
>
> The hardened mode makes installs significantly slower as Yarn has to
query the registry to make sure the information contained in the
lockfile are accurate. If your CI pipeline runs multiple jobs, we
recommend disabling the hardened mode in all but one of them so as to
limit the performance impact.
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
In certain scenarios, the front directory may not be writable.
When this is the case, writing the patched `index.html` should be
skipped just like when the file does not exist.
For brevity, I have replaced the `existsSync` check with a try-catch
that catches any errors occuring during read
or write of the index file.
The alternative would be `fs.accessSync` with `W_OK`, but that would
still throw an error if the file is not writable so I think it is
reasonable to skip it altogether and go straight for the read and write
attempts.
A specific scenario where the front directory is immutable is NixOS,
where the directory may be located in the read-only nix store.
This is not the prettiest fix but it's the 5th time I get the feedback
from a user that these fields should be readonly, let's have a special
case for them
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Pass the dropdownId into every closeDropdown() call so the instance ID
is always defined and the error no longer occurs.
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
resolve#11075
The issue was that when inline cells or table cells are in edit mode, a
click outside event listener is active, and its callback calls
event.stopImmediatePropagation(). This prevents the onClick of LinkChip
from firing, allowing the browser's default behavior to trigger the 'to'
link and cause a full page reload.
To fix this, I added event.preventDefault() inside each click outside
callback to stop the browser from reloading.
Another possible solution: check if currentTableCellInEditModePosition
or isInlineCellInEditMode is true, and if so:
Either convert the StyledLink in LinkChip into a div
Or set forceDisableClick = true, which falls back to AvatarChip.
Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ffd76fd-988e-484b-bad6-10e0147502c2
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18cfbc0e-8af6-4ecc-862e-a2b8f02e2535
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
# Introduction
In this PR we've mainly refactor the typing to be extending existing
entities.
Also handling relations through the field abstraction layer rather than
a dedicated one. We reverted midway
We then still need to:
- Handle indexing
- Uniqueness
- Add strong coverage and avoid static inline snapshoting as right now +
building a coherent testing set
- Deprecate the `standardId` in favor of a `uniqueIdentifier` on each
`objectMetadata` and `fieldMetadata`
- Rename types `input` to `flattened`
- Handle custom or non custom edit edge cases. ( e.g cannot delete a
standard field or object )
## Notes
Right I preferred including too many information ( whole object and
field input ) in the action context, we might wanna evict redundant
information in the future when implementing the runners
This PR fixes a UI bug where the "Quote" item in the slash command menu
was displayed without an icon.
The root cause was that the IconBlockquote component, while available in
the icons library, was not being exported from the internal twenty-ui
package.
## Before / After
## Changes:
- Exported IconBlockquote from TablerIcons.ts in the twenty-ui package.
- Updated getSlashMenu.ts in the twenty-front package to import and use
the IconBlockquote for the "Quote" menu item.
This PR is purely technical, it does produces any functional change to
the user
- add Lock mecanism to run steps concurrently
- update `workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts` to handle multi branch
workflow execution
- stop passing `context` through steps, it causes race condition issue
- refactor a little bit
- simplify `workflow-run.workspace-service.ts` to prepare `output` and
`context` removal
- move workflowRun status computing from `run-workflow.job.ts` to
`workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts`
## NOTA BENE
When a code step depends of 2 parents like in this config (see image
below)
If the form is submitted before the "Code - 2s" step succeed, the branch
merge "Form" step is launched twice.
- once because form is submission Succeed resumes the workflow in an
asynchronous job
- the second time is when the asynchronous job is launched when "Code -
2s" is succeeded
- the merge "Form" step makes the workflow waiting for response to
trigger the resume in another job
- during that time, the first resume job is launched, running the merge
"Form" step again
This issue only occurs with branch workflows. It will be solved by
checking if the currentStepToExecute is already in a SUCCESS state or
not
<img width="505" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b73839a1-16fe-45e1-a0d9-3efa26ab4f8b"
/>
# Introduction
In this PR we've initialized the `workspace-migration-v2` folder.
Focusing on the builder in the first place.
From now it contains:
- Basic temporary types ( `fieldMetadataEntity` and
`ObjectMetadataEntity` )
- Object actions builder ( create, delete, update )
- Fields actions builder ( create, delete ) ( update coming in a
following PR )
We will still have to handle specific conditions such as:
- Index creation
- Uniqueness addition removal
- Relation
We also need to determine when we want to compute and transpile the
object no field `uniqueIdentifier`
We're aiming to merge this first in order to avoid accumulating code in
this PR
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
This PR is raised to close the issue #13044
But there are some doubts that needs to be approved.
If the fields are not custom then we were saving the changes in
**standardOverrides** obj in which only three fields are
overridableFields **label, icon & description** can be updated for a
field.
You can see this in _before-update-one-field.hook.ts_ on line 85
```ts
const overridableFields = ['label', 'icon', 'description'];
```
If the field to be updated are from these three we are putting this in a
**standardOverrides** obj and passing it
However in our _field-metadata.service.ts_ file. We have **updateOne**
function inside it we have wrote a condition if **isCustom** is false
then the purpose was to build the updatableFields from the
**standardOverrides** obj that we got in **fieldMetadataInput** but
there was an error in it. As you can see below
```ts
const updatableFieldInput =
existingFieldMetadata.isCustom === false
? this.buildUpdatableStandardFieldInput(
fieldMetadataInput,
existingFieldMetadata,
)
: fieldMetadataInput;
```
However, the issue was that we were placing the entire
**standardOverrides** object inside **updatableFieldInput** again —
instead of merging its individual fields (label, icon, description)
directly into the update payload.
This PR fixes that by correctly applying the overrides into the
top-level object.
Please refer to the file changes for the full context.
But the thing i don't know.
[ ] - Is this the correct expected flow??
[ ]- Will this change break anything elsewhere?
I still have doubts on these two. Let me know if I missed something.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jagss24 <btwitsjagannat12@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR, I'm fixing a bug introduced in recent performance work on
the cache.
Bug context: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12865
Related PR opened by a contributor:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13003
## Root cause
We cache all objectMetadataItems at graphql level : see
`useCachedMetadata` hook:
- instead of going through the regular resolvers, we direlcty load data
from the cache. However this data must be localized regarding labels and
descriptions
In a precedent refactoring, we introduced the notion of locale in the
cache key. However, the user locale was not properly taken into account
as we did not have the information in this hook.
## Fix
1. **Introduce locale in userWorkspace entity**. The locale is stored on
workspaceMember in each postgres workspaceSchema (workspace_xxx) which
is the alter ego of userWorkspace in postgres core schema. Note that we
can't store it in user as a user can be part of multiple workspaces (the
locale already there must be seen as a default for this user), and we
cannot rely on workspaceMember as we would need to query the
workspaceSchema in the authentication layer which we want to avoid for
performance reasons.
2. During request hydration from token (containing the userWorkspaceId),
we fetch the userWorkspace and store it in the Request (this impact both
AuthContext and Request interface)
3. Leverage userWorkspace.locale in the useCachedMetadata hook
## Additional notes
There is no need to change the way we store and retrieve the
object-metadata-maps object itself which is different from the graphql
layer cache. object-metadadata-maps are not localized
