## Context
All objects have '...duplicates' resolver but only companies and people
have duplicate criteria (hard coded constant).
Gql schema and resolver should be created only if duplicate criteria
exist.
## Solution
- Add a new @WorkspaceDuplicateCriteria decorator at object level,
defining duplicate criteria for given object.
- Add a new duplicate criteria field in ObjectMetadata table
- Update schema and resolver building logic
- Update front requests for duplicate check (only for object with
criteria defined)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9828
# Folders
Adding the possibility to synchronize messages form more than one
microsoft folder (think "inbox" or "sent items")
It will keep the current way for gmail.
- step 1 : implement a first version of full message & partial message ✅
- step 2 : implement retro-compatibility which includes the command to
run the migration to backfill microsoft synccursor from messageChannelt
o messageFolders
Context :
We want to implement some counters to monitor server health. First
counters will track : messageChannel sync status during job execution
and invalid captcha.
How :
Counters are stored in cache and grouped by one-minute windows.
Controllers are created for each metric, aggregating counter over a
five-minutes window.
Endpoints are public and will be queried by Prometheus.
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/55
One of the steps to address #8128
How to test:
Please change the locale in the settings and click on change password
button. A password reset email in the preferred locale will be sent.
Todo:
- Remove the hardcoded locales for invitation, warn suspended workspace
email, clean suspended workspace emails
- Need to test invitation, email verification, warn suspended workspace
email, clean suspended workspace emails
- The duration variable `5 minutes` is always in english. Do we need to
do something about that? It does seems odd in case of chinese
translations.
Notes:
- Only tested the password reset , password update notify templates.
- Cant test email verification due to error during sign up `Internal
server error: New workspace setup is disabled`
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Solves :
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/251
**TLDR:**
Clean Billing Code using feedback of the previous PR (#9865). Normalized
the metadata and names of the products, prices, and meters in Stripe so
that they can be accessed in stripe's test mode and live mode.
**In order to test:**
1. Have the environment variable IS_BILLING_ENABLED set to true and add
the other required environment variables for Billing to work
2. Do a database reset (to ensure that the new feature flag is properly
added and that the billing tables are created)
3. Run the command: npx nx run twenty-server:command
billing:sync-plans-data (if you don't do that the products and prices
will not be present in the database)
4. Run the server , the frontend, the worker, and the stripe listen
command (stripe listen --forward-to
http://localhost:3000/billing/webhooks)
5. Buy a subscription for the Acme workspace
6. Create a workflow and run it
7. After the run has been finished check in sprite the quantity of
events in the CreditMeter, you should see that there is a new occurence
with value one.
Implementing the Outlook icon for CreatedBy, only for emails.
Not in this PR original scope : The similar feature for calendar created
records. Since it was straightforward, I added it to the scope of this
PR.
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/252
Solves :
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/241https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/254
**TLDR:**
- Add BillingMeterEventService and StripeBillingMeterEventService in
order to send billing meter events to stripe.
- Plugged the service into workflow node execution for testing purposes
(more improvements on this area will be done in the next PR's)
**In order to test:**
- Have the environment variable IS_BILLING_ENABLED set to true and add
the other required environment variables for Billing to work
- Do a database reset (to ensure that the new feature flag is properly
added and that the billing tables are created)
- Run the command: npx nx run twenty-server:command
billing:sync-plans-data (if you don't do that the products and prices
will not be present in the database)
- Run the server , the frontend, the worker, and the stripe listen
command (stripe listen --forward-to
http://localhost:3000/billing/webhooks)
- Buy a subscription for the Acme workspace
- Create a workflow and run it
- After the run has been finished check in sprite the quantity of events
in the CreditMeter, you should see that there is a new occurence with
value one.
**Take into consideration:**
- I used an eventName that I have made a long time ago, so it hasn't a
significant naming. I'm updating the meters and associated prices in
stripe to use the correct meter with a more clearer eventName.
- I put some error handling in the execution of the workflow nodes, this
is still incomplete and needs some refinement, I would like the feedback
of the workflows track for a more cleaner approach
We create draft without emitting creation event. So workflow statuses
are not properly updated
This service needs a refacto. Will do it once we get out from fast
follows rush
Similar to ObjectMetadata translation
Also fixed an issue linked to the migration from `t` to `message`
helper: we're forced to rebuild the ID ourselves
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
- Sync metadata to create workflow entities, since those are not behind
a flag anymore
- Seed workflow views
- Seed workspace favorite for workflow
- Put all steps in upgrade command
From now on workflow entities and views will be seed for every new
workspace. What will prevent user to see those is the feature flag used
in frontend. It will prevent workflow objects to be stored in the recoil
state.
Without feature flag, workflows will:
- remain invisible in metadata
- not be accessible through views or show page
- remain invisible on side menu
- remove delete serverless function when archiving workflow version
- update copy serverless function to reset serverless function to old
version
- remove createNewWorkflowVersion and use createDraftFromWorkflowVersion
- fix step update issue and optimistic rendering when generate draft
from active version
In this PR:
- migrate WorkspaceActivationStatus to twenty-shared (and update case to
make FE and BE consistent)
- introduce isWorkspaceActiveOrSuspended in twenty-shared
- refactor the code to use it (when we fetch data on the FE, we want to
keep SUSPENDED workspace working + when we sync workspaces we want it
too)
### Introducing
- mock files in order to setup unit test on parsing outlook messages
- special spec files for development purposes : dev.spec files. They are
CI skipped with xdescribe but very useful for iterating on new messages
format
- main functionality : getMessages. We use microsoft default client to
do so, using the $batch endpoint to group calls by 20
### documentation
final touch to add troubleshooting tips
- catch error on action execution. We will log the error and return it
in the step
- catch error on workflow run
- remove the catch in the action. All actions should simply throw and
let the executor do the job
<img width="1512" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-01-14 à 17 35 53"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dcf79567-a309-45f1-a640-c50b7ac4769b"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/52
- contrary to title, we do not remove serverless functions on workflow
version archivation because serverless fucntion might be used in another
workflow version
- we fix the serverless funciton version displayed in the code step
- we allow test function version in step display right drawer
- we delete serverless function only when serverless function has no
published version
