Follow-up on https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12007
In this PR
- adding a filter on HttpExceptionHandlerService to filter out 4xx
errors from driver handling (as we do for graphQL errors: see
useGraphQLErrorHandler hook - only filteredIssues are sent to`
exceptionHandlerService.captureExceptions()`.)
- grouping together more missing metadata issues
- attempting to use error codes as issues names in sentry to improve UI;
for now it says "Error" all the time
Updated URL reference from getFrontUrl to getBaseUrl to ensure correct
hostname handling. Adjusted record filtering logic to exclude successful
records, preventing unnecessary rendering in the UI.
# Introduction
Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles
## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc
## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment
## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
## Description
When a calendar channel fails, its status is not reset during the
reconnect step.
In some cases, resetting is necessary—especially when we’ve deployed a
fix and users try to reconnect their accounts after the patch.
## Why reseting to initial state
Our processes are idempotent, so we can safely set the status to null to
restart the flow. This approach covers all cases and avoids edge
conditions caused by inconsistent statuses.
Fixes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12026
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12040
When fields are deleted but still used in workflows we do not update
create record action settings.
It breaks all following workflow execution and the user cannot update
the settings anymore.
This PR fixes the bug by filtering on existing fields.
Next step will be to clean settings on field deletion. Adding it to fast
follows.
Also lowering throttle limit because some infinite loops are not
catched.
This PR attemps at improving sentry grouping and filtering by
- Using the exceptionCode as the fingerprint when the error is a
customException. For this to work in this PR we are now throwing
customExceptions instead of internalServerError deprived of their code.
They will still be converted to Internal server errors when sent back as
response
- Filtering 4xx issues where it was missing (for emailVerification
because errors were not handled, for invalid captcha and billing errors
because they are httpErrors and not graphqlErrors)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Several users have complained about not being able to read their emails
anymore.
This is because the find-messages post query hook is expecting
ObjectRecord[] as an input but is actually getting a graphql Connection
Typing was wrong. This PR fixes the typing and make sure the post query
hook always get an ObjectRecord[]
Using useEffect triggered at ActivityRichTextEditor unmount, to delete
attachments only when note is closed (and not when file block is deleted
during note update to keep command + z shortcut)
closes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11229
This is a first PR to remove old relation logic
Next steps:
- remove relationMetadata from cache
- remove relationMetadata table content and structure
- refactor relationDefinition to leverage field.settings instead
- In this PR the default value of IS_CONFIG_VARIABLES_IN_DB_ENABLED has
been changed to true,
- This is my first time writing integration tests, so I’d appreciate a
thorough review. :)
I’ve tried to follow the existing test patterns closely, but there might
be some small mistakes I may have missed.
Also let me know if I have missed any important test cases that should
be tested
UPDATE -
### Config Value Converter Refactoring
- Created a centralized type transformers registry with bidirectional
validation
- Refactored ConfigValueConverterService to support validation in both
directions:
- Maintained existing DB-to-app conversion behavior
- Added validation for app-to-DB conversion
- Added integration tests to verify validation works in both directions
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
# Display "Soft-Deleted Workspace Members" in Actor Field Display
Reminder of the issue :
<img width="154" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 11 59"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/168f8743-2684-4d9a-b1a4-e86bb335f7a4"
/>
- `ActorFieldDisplay` component : display soft-deleted members
- `UserService` includes soft-deleted records when fetching workspace
members. This is the tricky part : do we want that for all workspace
members or maybe i could create another property dedicated to workspace
members and softdeleted ones. To be discussed
Result looks like this (we loose the source and the context in this
impleentation)
<img width="114" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 05 28"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cdddd91-454f-4e96-8d6d-6fe671658945"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11870
Another way we could also get into :
We could also, when a workspace user is softDeleted, change the current
implementation : we could avoid to delete the ActorMetadata like
CreatedByName (and context and source) in the "Person" table.
It would look more like this
<img width="111" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 06 16"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/daa4ece2-200a-41f0-ba24-177375c72983"
/>
However, this implementation is requires more work, and IMO harder to
maintain since is decouples completely the record from the workspace
member. This could be an issue in case we want tohard delete a user, or
decide another logic to display the Actor name.
Since the usecase should be pretty rare, I chose the first one but
willing to discuss it
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
In this PR we are
1. cleaning typeORM service by removing connectToDataSource method
2. using workspaceDataSource instead of mainDataSource when possible,
and replacing raw SQL with workspaceRepository methods to use
First and main step of
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/747
We are implementing a permission check layer in our custom
WorkspaceEntityManager by overriding all the db-executing methods (this
PR only overrides some as a POC, the rest will be done in the next PR).
Our custom repositories call entity managers under the hood to interact
with the db so this solves the repositories case too.
This is still behind the feature flag IsPermissionsV2Enabled.
In the next PR
- finish overriding all the methods required in WorkspaceEntityManager
- add tests
Preview :
<img width="501" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 16 24 34"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c649df1-0e26-4ddc-8e13-ebd78af7ec09"
/>
Done :
- Fix getCalendarEventsFromPersonIds and getCalendarEventsFromCompanyId
(include accountOwner check)
- Fix permission check on pre-hook - Pre-hook seems useless, calendar
events are always on METADATA or SHARE_EVERYTHING visibility, else post
hook always has the responsibility of returning the data user can
access. >> To delete or to keep in case other visibility options are
added ?
- Add post hook to secure finOne / findMany calendarEvents resolver
- Update design
To do :
- same on messages (PR to arrive)
closes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9826
No need to audit log workflow runs as it's already a form of audit log.
Add more audit log for other objects
Rename MessagingTelemetry to MessagingMonitoring
Merge Analytics and Audit in one (Audit)
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
In this PR:
- this should fix the sync metadata for new relation system
This goes with the recent PR:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11725
What we want:
- ONE_TO_MANY relations should have no joinColumn and no onDelete
- MANY_TO_ONE should have both
We want to have fewer base path for routing.
We will have:
- /files
- /webhooks
- /graphql
- /metadata
- /rest
- /auth
- /healthz
I'm moving /open-api under /rest, and centralizing the webhooks
(removing /stripe and /cloudflare)
Extracted isWorkEmail check into a variable for reusability and adjusted
subdomain generation to conditionally include email. This enhances code
readability and maintains logic consistency.
Let's deprecate Sentry Release and use APP_VERSION instead.
It'll make it more clear in the interface to use named version for bug
analysis, than commit sha
related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/601
## Done
- add a `onDbEvent` `Subscription` graphql endpoint to listen to
database_event using what we have done with webhooks:
- you can subscribe to any `action` (created, updated, ...) for any
`objectNameSingular` or a specific `recordId`. Parameters are nullable
and treated as wildcards when null.
- returns events with following shape
```typescript
@Field(() => String)
eventId: string;
@Field()
emittedAt: string;
@Field(() => DatabaseEventAction)
action: DatabaseEventAction;
@Field(() => String)
objectNameSingular: string;
@Field(() => GraphQLJSON)
record: ObjectRecord;
@Field(() => [String], { nullable: true })
updatedFields?: string[];
```
- front provide a componentEffect `<ListenRecordUpdatesEffect />` that
listen for an `objectNameSingular`, a `recordId` and a list of
`listenedFields`. It subscribes to record updates and updates its apollo
cached value for specified `listenedFields`
- subscription is protected with credentials
## Result
Here is an application with `workflowRun`
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c964d857-3b54-495f-bf14-587ba26c5a8c
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
### Remove unnecessary `await` from `encodeFileToken` calls (now
synchronous) #11611
#### Context
In [PR #11385 – commit
26c17f3](26c17f3205),
`FileService.encodeFileToken()` was updated to be a **synchronous**
method. However, several places in the codebase were still calling it
using `await`.
#### Changes
This PR cleans up those redundant `await` usages to:
- Improve clarity
- Avoid confusion (no longer awaiting a non-Promise)
- Slightly reduce overhead in affected functions
- Removed `await` from calls to `this.fileService.encodeFileToken(...)`