# Introduction
Encountering a blocking issue due to legacy upgrade history in staging
due to relation refactor
For the moment ( release 0.53 ) swallowing
@charlesBochet
## How to test
```ts
checkout v0.52.11
yarn
database:reset
checkout 0.53
yarn
build server
migrate
upgrade
```
# Display "Soft-Deleted Workspace Members" in Actor Field Display
Reminder of the issue :
<img width="154" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 11 59"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/168f8743-2684-4d9a-b1a4-e86bb335f7a4"
/>
- `ActorFieldDisplay` component : display soft-deleted members
- `UserService` includes soft-deleted records when fetching workspace
members. This is the tricky part : do we want that for all workspace
members or maybe i could create another property dedicated to workspace
members and softdeleted ones. To be discussed
Result looks like this (we loose the source and the context in this
impleentation)
<img width="114" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 05 28"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cdddd91-454f-4e96-8d6d-6fe671658945"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11870
Another way we could also get into :
We could also, when a workspace user is softDeleted, change the current
implementation : we could avoid to delete the ActorMetadata like
CreatedByName (and context and source) in the "Person" table.
It would look more like this
<img width="111" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 06 16"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/daa4ece2-200a-41f0-ba24-177375c72983"
/>
However, this implementation is requires more work, and IMO harder to
maintain since is decouples completely the record from the workspace
member. This could be an issue in case we want tohard delete a user, or
decide another logic to display the Actor name.
Since the usecase should be pretty rare, I chose the first one but
willing to discuss it
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
## Context
While deploying the IS_NEW_RELATION_ENABLED (we don't compute relation
based on relationMetadata anymore) to existing workspace, I've tested to
run a sync-metadata post feature flag activation. This has raised two
issues:
- the workspaceMigration generator (which is over-complex and should be
refactored later) for fieldMetadata of type RELATION was not handling
settings update properly ;
- we need to delete existing fieldMetadata corresponding to the UUID
foreignKey as they are not needed anymore. This is handled as a 0.53
upgrade command as 0.53 will also come with the full removal of the old
relation system
---------
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
This PR adds what's needed to filter on the ADDRESS sub-fields, notably
the country sub-field, that requires a country multi select component,
which was created in this PR (ObjectFilterDropdownCountrySelect)
This PR refactors the common logic between advanced filter dropdown
field selection logic and view bar filter dropdown field selection
logic, notably in useFilterDropdownSelectableFieldMetadataItems.
There are now new components to identify clearly what's tied to view bar
or advanced filter, it could be further simplified or factorized, but as
it is right now, it's simple enough to be maintained easily even if a
little bit too verbose, which is often the best trade-off we should aim
for.
Improvements :
- Added the CompositeFieldSubFieldName where needed
- Fixes bug in advanced filter dropdown input
- Fixes dropdown content width bug in advanced filter dropdown input
- Fixes a bug when inputing a Currency filter without a sub-field in
view bar filter dropdown
- Used DropdownMenuSearchInput instead of a custom StyledInput which was
doing exactly the same thing
- Factorized the state setting logic in
useSetAdvancedFilterDropdownStates in an anonymous function
setAdvancedFilterDropdownStates
- Created useSelectFilterFromViewBarFilterDropdown hook to have a more
meaningful and clear logic to abstract what happens when we select a
field to filter in the view bard field select dropdown
- Fixes a bug with advanced filter operand dropdown select which wasn't
modifying the current record filter and creating a stale state.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/612
In this PR we are
1. cleaning typeORM service by removing connectToDataSource method
2. using workspaceDataSource instead of mainDataSource when possible,
and replacing raw SQL with workspaceRepository methods to use
First and main step of
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/747
We are implementing a permission check layer in our custom
WorkspaceEntityManager by overriding all the db-executing methods (this
PR only overrides some as a POC, the rest will be done in the next PR).
Our custom repositories call entity managers under the hood to interact
with the db so this solves the repositories case too.
This is still behind the feature flag IsPermissionsV2Enabled.
In the next PR
- finish overriding all the methods required in WorkspaceEntityManager
- add tests
Preview :
<img width="501" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 16 24 34"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c649df1-0e26-4ddc-8e13-ebd78af7ec09"
/>
Done :
- Fix getCalendarEventsFromPersonIds and getCalendarEventsFromCompanyId
(include accountOwner check)
- Fix permission check on pre-hook - Pre-hook seems useless, calendar
events are always on METADATA or SHARE_EVERYTHING visibility, else post
hook always has the responsibility of returning the data user can
access. >> To delete or to keep in case other visibility options are
added ?
- Add post hook to secure finOne / findMany calendarEvents resolver
- Update design
To do :
- same on messages (PR to arrive)
closes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9826
No need to audit log workflow runs as it's already a form of audit log.
Add more audit log for other objects
Rename MessagingTelemetry to MessagingMonitoring
Merge Analytics and Audit in one (Audit)
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
Followup of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11784
Again some propaganda for the
[noUncheckedIndexedAccess](https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/#noUncheckedIndexedAccess)
that involved this @charlesBochet 👀
That's very risky to have this setup to false especially in the backend
regarding the twenty-server metadata nature
Also suggested that we do some integration testing ( e2e nestsJs tests )
on a related endpoint that could related we always retrieve the same
form result output
We could also do some unit testing of the method but like the idea to
ship it through the api itself
In this PR:
- this should fix the sync metadata for new relation system
This goes with the recent PR:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11725
What we want:
- ONE_TO_MANY relations should have no joinColumn and no onDelete
- MANY_TO_ONE should have both
We want to have fewer base path for routing.
We will have:
- /files
- /webhooks
- /graphql
- /metadata
- /rest
- /auth
- /healthz
I'm moving /open-api under /rest, and centralizing the webhooks
(removing /stripe and /cloudflare)
Extracted isWorkEmail check into a variable for reusability and adjusted
subdomain generation to conditionally include email. This enhances code
readability and maintains logic consistency.
Let's deprecate Sentry Release and use APP_VERSION instead.
It'll make it more clear in the interface to use named version for bug
analysis, than commit sha
## Introduction
This PR enables functionality discussed in [Layout Date
Formatting](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/97).
### TLDR;
It enables greater control of date formatting at the object's field
level by upgrading all DATE and DATE_TIME fields' settings from:
```ts
{
displayAsRelativeDate: boolean
}
```
to:
```ts
type FieldDateDisplayFormat = 'full_date' | 'relative_date' | 'date' | 'time' | 'year' | 'custom'
{
displayFormat: FieldDateDisplayFormat
}
```
PR also includes an upgrade command that will update any existing DATE
and DATE_TIME fields to the new settings value
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
This PR implements what's missing to have sub-field filtering.
There is a backend modification to save subFieldName, we just add this
field on view filter workspace entity.
This PR adds subFieldName where missing in frontend, notably in
applyFilter calls, that will be refactored soon.
Also fixes a bug in ViewBar where Add Filter button was at the right
side of the ViewBar, while it should be right after the chips section.
Another bug fixed where we wouldn't delete an empty record filter on
dropdown click outside from the view bar, which was already the case
where using the filter chip dropdown.
<img width="512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9a2f8d2-a66f-4800-853a-4df5c6b627a9"
/>
<img width="495" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7542697b-0689-4095-9c3c-b5e47875355f"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
