Paul Rastoin 97d4ec96af Fix view filter update and deletion propagation (#12082)
# Introduction

Diff description: ~500 tests and +500 additions

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/731

## What has been done here
In a nutshell on a field metadata type ( `SELECT MULTI_SELECT` ) update,
we will be browsing all `ViewFilters` in a post hook searching for some
referencing related updated `fieldMetadata` select. In order to update
or delete the `viewFilter` depending on the associated mutations.

## How to test:
- Add FieldMetadata `SELECT | MULTI_SELECT` to an existing or a new
`objectMetadata`
- Create a filtered view on created `fieldMetadata` with any options you
would like
- Remove some options ( in the best of the world some that are selected
by the filter ) from the `fieldMetadata` settings page
- Go back to the filtered view, removed or updated options should have
been hydrated in the `displayValue` and the filtered data should make
sense

## All filtered options are deleted edge case
If an update implies that a viewFilter does not have any existing
related options anymore, then we remove the viewFilter

## Testing
```sh 
PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/update-one-field-metadata-related-record.integration-spec.ts (27 s)
  update-one-field-metadata-related-record
    SELECT
      ✓ should delete related view filter if all select field options got deleted (2799 ms)
      ✓ should update related multi selected options view filter (1244 ms)
      ✓ should update related solo selected option view filter (1235 ms)
      ✓ should handle partial deletion of selected options in view filter (1210 ms)
      ✓ should handle reordering of options while maintaining view filter values (1487 ms)
      ✓ should handle no changes update of options while maintaining existing view filter values (1174 ms)
      ✓ should handle adding new options while maintaining existing view filter (1174 ms)
      ✓ should update display value with options label if less than 3 options are selected (1249 ms)
      ✓ should throw error if view filter value is not a stringified JSON array (1300 ms)
    MULTI_SELECT
      ✓ should delete related view filter if all select field options got deleted (1127 ms)
      ✓ should update related multi selected options view filter (1215 ms)
      ✓ should update related solo selected option view filter (1404 ms)
      ✓ should handle partial deletion of selected options in view filter (1936 ms)
      ✓ should handle reordering of options while maintaining view filter values (1261 ms)
      ✓ should handle no changes update of options while maintaining existing view filter values (1831 ms)
      ✓ should handle adding new options while maintaining existing view filter (1610 ms)
      ✓ should update display value with options label if less than 3 options are selected (1889 ms)
      ✓ should throw error if view filter value is not a stringified JSON array (1365 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots:   18 passed, 18 total
Time:        27.039 s
```
## Out of scope
- We should handle ViewFilter validation when extracting its definition
from the metadata
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1009

## Concerns
- Are we able through the api to update an RATING fieldMetadata ? ( if
yes than that's an issue and we should handle RATING the same way than
for SELECT and MULTI_SELECT )
- It's not possible to group a view from a MULTI_SELECT field

The above points create a double nor a triple "lecture" to the post hook
effect:
- ViewGroup -> only SELECT
- VIewFilter -> only SELECT || MULTI_SELECT
- Rating nothing
I think we should determine the scope of all of that

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-05-28 10:22:28 +00:00
2025-05-14 16:35:51 +05:30
2024-11-06 14:24:07 +01:00
2025-04-09 17:35:25 +02:00
2025-05-27 14:06:21 +02:00
2025-03-05 14:27:17 +01:00
2024-01-10 17:05:23 +01:00
2025-03-07 18:19:42 +01:00
2025-04-16 11:46:37 +02:00


Twenty logo

The #1 Open-Source CRM

🌐 Website · 📚 Documentation · Roadmap · Discord · Figma


Companies view


Installation

See:
🚀 Self-hosting
🖥️ Local Setup

Does the world need another CRM?

We built Twenty for three reasons:

CRMs are too expensive, and users are trapped. Companies use locked-in customer data to hike prices. It shouldn't be that way.

A fresh start is required to build a better experience. We can learn from past mistakes and craft a cohesive experience inspired by new UX patterns from tools like Notion, Airtable or Linear.

We believe in Open-source and community. Hundreds of developers are already building Twenty together. Once we have plugin capabilities, a whole ecosystem will grow around it.


What You Can Do With Twenty

We're currently developing Twenty's beta version.

Please feel free to flag any specific needs you have by creating an issue.

Below are a few features we have implemented to date:

Add, filter, sort, edit, and track customers:

Companies view

Create one or several opportunities for each company:

Opportunities view

Track deals effortlessly with the email integration:

Emails

Tailor your data model to meet business needs:

Data model

See rich notes displayed in a timeline:

Rich notes

Create tasks on records

Tasks

Keyboard shortcuts

Connect your CRM to all your tools through our APIs and Webhooks.

API


Stack

Thanks

Chromatic Greptile Sentry Crowdin

Thanks to these amazing services that we use and recommend for UI testing (Chromatic), code review (Greptile), catching bugs (Sentry) and translating (Crowdin).

Join the Community

Description
No description provided
Readme AGPL-3.0 324 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 98.7%
MDX 1%