- add to step output schema the information that field is a composite
sub field
- from output schema, when selecting the variable, copy all info
required to stepFilter
- from stepFilter, when selecting a value, display a special component
for composites
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13297
See SettingsDataModelFieldDateForm form validation which expects a
settings field to be present with a default display format. This PR adds
the missing initial value.
Context :
Large PR with 600+ test files. Enable connect and disconnect logic in
createMany (upsert true) / updateOne / updateMany resolvers
- Add disconnect logic
- Gather disconnect and connect logic -> called relation nested queries
- Move logic to query builder (insert and update one) with a preparation
step in .set/.values and an execution step in .execute
- Add integration tests
Test :
- Test API call on updateMany, updateOne, createMany (upsert:true) with
connect/disconnect
# Introduction
Created the runner metadata for the field and object
We should keep in mind that any runner handler will only iterate over an
atomic instance of entity ( object field index etc )
Never triggerring any side effect or whats over
In this way we will need to implement a deferred transaction, as for
when we create a relation we will inject to the first created field of
both the `relationTargetFieldMetadataId` deterministically computed
before its own creation
This would result in pg constraint brokage if not deferred
## Updates
- We decided gather create_fields under the create_object as they will
be building within the same sql query. This will ease both generation
and computation and avoid disassembling to reassemble afterwards
- Refactored FlatFieldMetadata to handle relation typing with flat
occurences
```ts
runCreateFieldSchemaMigration = async ({
action,
queryRunner,
}: WorkspaceMigrationActionRunnerArgs<CreateFieldAction>) => {
if (isFlatFieldMetadataEntityOfType(action.flatFieldMetadata, FieldMetadataType.RELATION)) {
action.flatFieldMetadata.flatRelationTargetObjectMetadata
}else {
action.flatFieldMetadata.flatRelationTargetObjectMetadata // tsc-error never
}
return;
};
```
## TODO
- ~~Discuss action signature with @Weiko in order to anticipate `schema`
runner needed grain~~
- ~~Refactor the object actions to contain picked `flatObjectMetadata`~~
- Implem index service
We will have floating steps in our workflow with the branch design.
Currently, a step without parent is considered linked to the trigger. We
need to distinguish the 2 cases. Thus this PR:
- add `nextStepIds` to workflowVersion.trigger
- create a command to migrate existing triggers
Should now properly match logical expressions like and(...), or(...)
instead of and/or without parenthesis, this should fix the issue with
fields that start with or/and
This PR adapts teh deleteOneField to make sure morph relations can be
deleted, either
- from a relation type,
- or from a morph relation type (which is the most obvious case).
This PR covers
- the deletion of fieldMetadata
- and the migrationof workspace schemas, by using the already existing
definition of relation migrations
This PR implements a new test suite: "Delete Object metadata with morph
relation" and completes the other test suites for FieldMetadata and
ObjectMetadata creation/deletion.
Last, we added a nitpick from @paul I forgot on a previous PR on
process-nested-realtion-v2
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1197
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This PR adds the ability to save an any field filter to a view.
It adds a new `anyFieldFilterValue` on both core view and workspace view
entities.
It also introduces the necessary utils that mimic the logic that manages
the save of record filters and record sorts on views.
Increment/Decrement methods were broken and were executing a SELECT
query while selecting twice the same table so the id column reference
was not precise enough. For some reason it didn't recognise the builder
as an update builder AND aliases were not parsed properly
I've modified the code to re-use the existing update method that is
correctly implemented-
BEFORE
```sql
query failed: SELECT entity FROM "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5"."viewField" "entity", "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5"."viewField" "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5.viewField" WHERE "id" IN ($1) -- PARAMETERS: ["cd665f5b-c3ce-44ec-a9b0-51a2d711287e"]
error: error: column reference "id" is ambiguous
```
AFTER
```sql
query: UPDATE "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5"."viewField" SET "position" = "position" + 1, "updatedAt" = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP WHERE "id" IN ($1) -- PARAMETERS: ["cd665f5b-c3ce-44ec-a9b0-51a2d711287e"]
```
### Summary
This PR fixes an inconsistency in the display of application versions in
the Admin Panel. Previously, the "Current version" was displayed with a
"v" prefix (e.g., `v1.1.1`), while the "Latest version" was displayed
without it (e.g., `1.1.1`).
### Problem
The inconsistency originated from two different data sources being
handled differently in the backend:
- `currentVersion` was read directly from the `APP_VERSION`
configuration variable, which includes the "v" prefix.
- `latestVersion` was fetched from the Docker Hub API, and the
`semver.coerce()` function was used to parse it, which strips the "v"
prefix.
### Solution
The fix addresses the root cause in the [AdminPanelService] on the
backend. The `semver.coerce()` function is now also applied to the
`currentVersion`.
This ensures that both version numbers are normalized at the data
source, providing a consistent format before being sent to the frontend.
This is a cleaner approach than manipulating the data on the client
side.
**Before:**
- Current version: `v1.1.1`
- Latest version: `1.1.1`
**After:**
- Current version: `1.1.1`
- Latest version: `1.1.1`
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
In this PR, behind a feature flag, we add a permission layer check based
on the read permission.
It is done by computing a map of an object's fields, where keys are the
column names and values the fieldMetadata id, making them comparable to
the restricted fields ids list stored in the permission cache.
For mutations (create, update, delete, destroy), we need to check the
read permission on the returned field, as they may differ from the
updated field. The write field permission will be tackled in a different
PR.
## Problem
After migrating webhooks and API keys from workspace to core level, REST
API endpoints were still creating entities in workspace schema
(`workspace_*`) instead of core schema, causing webhooks to not fire.
## Solution
- Added dedicated REST controllers for webhooks (`/rest/webhooks`) and
API keys (`/rest/apiKeys`)
- Updated dynamic controller to block workspace-gated entities from
being processed
- Fixed OpenAPI documentation to exclude these endpoints from playground
- Ensured return formats match GraphQL resolvers exactly
## Testing
✅ All endpoints tested with provided auth token - webhooks and API keys
now correctly stored in `core` schema
This PR adds any field filter request generation utils with its unit
test.
It also calls this new util in the relevant requests for table and
board.
This PR also adds a new corresponding state in context store so that the
filter is handled in command menu and actions.
We also add this new filter to the aggregate queries.
The RecordShowPage story was also fixed.
Implementation is very simple
Established authentication dynamic is intercepted at
getAuthTokensFromLoginToken. If 2FA is required, a pattern similar to
EmailVerification is executed. That is, getAuthTokensFromLoginToken
mutation fails with either of the following errors:
1. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
2. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_PROVISION_REQUIRED
UI knows how to respond accordingly.
2FA provisioning occurs at the 2FA resolver.
2FA verification, currently only OTP, is handled by auth.resolver's
getAuthTokensFromOTP
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Baptiste Ronssin <65334819+jbronssin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
resolve#13168 , #8501
This PR fixes an issue where the onChange trigger was deleting all
attachments by removing the JWT token from their paths (if it existed)
and comparing the new body with the old body to identify deleted
attachments. It ensures that only attachments actually removed from the
body get deleted, preventing unintended deletion of attachments not
added directly through the body. It also handles updating attachment
names in the body so changes are reflected in Files, with related tests
updated accordingly.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8d824a24-b257-4794-942e-3b2dceb9907d
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- add fieldMetadataId to step output schema
- use it to display FormFieldInput in Filter input
- few fixes for a few fields
Next step:
- Handle composite fields
- Design review
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13264, this PR
introduces several `fieldMetadataEntity` typing enhancement suggestions.
Mainly any nullable field metadata entity properties are now either
nullable or defined.
Or never if field is dynamically required or not depending on the field
metadata type
This enhance DevX
## Standards
- field enum ( `MULTI_SELECT`, `SELECT`, `RATING` ) will never have
`options` set to `NULL` in db
- field `RELATION` or `MORH_RELATION` won't ever have its relation
fields set to `NULL` in db
- field of any type `settings`, even if possibly defined, can still be
`NULL` in db
- field of any type `defaultValue`, even if possibly defined, can still
be `NULL` in db
It coud be interesting to guard these standards by adding dedicated pg
constraints on each field
## TypesScript type tests
added coverage for each `settings`, `defaultValue`, and `options`
depending on the current `fieldMetadata`
Honestly I don' know if this typescript assertions test file is not
overkill, but regarding metadata staticness it might be very interesting
to have this guard
## Possible improvements
- We could type as `unknown` instead of "all" on `FieldMetadataType`
inferrance
- We still need to deprecate remaining duplicated entities such as
`Index/Field/MetadataInterface` etc not a huge refactor neither urgent
## Problem
Previously, the newly created "message list fetch process" left the
message channel in an "ONGOING" status indefinitely.
## Why
Before only "fullSync" messageChannel were concerned by this method.
What happened it sometimes the providers gave empty messageExternalIds
during the initial fetch. Happens for a newly created email account on
gmail or microsoft (not sure which one)
Now that we gather both of sync methods (partial and full) we cannot use
this anly longer. Because after the first sync, if no new messages
arrived in the last 5 minutes, there will be none, so it was consiedered
as emptyMailbox (which is wrong)
## Solution
Removed this logic from the messageChannel since now we will rely on
each messageFolder (messageList) to handle the logic of going for a full
or not sync.
## Question
We might see some bugs in case some newly created email account without
messageList in case the provider does not give a nextSyncCursor at the
messageList level. Not easy to test
## Bonus
We also cleant a useless service method called getCursor that was not
used anywhere.
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
In this PR:
- Open filters in the side panel for **workflows**
- Open filters in the side panel for **workflow versions**
- Preparation for opening filters in the side panel for **workflow
runs**
- Add many tests to increase the coverage
Remaining to do:
- Open filters in the side panel for **workflow runs**
- Upon filter creation, open it in the side panel
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug description
All old messages were deleted after the first partial sync because the
diff between the existing messages and the messages returned from the
fetch was done considering that it was always a full sync (ie, that we
always retrieve the full list of message ids). But in a partial sync,
only the new messages appear in the list.
This bug was introduced by https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13302
when trying to merge the logic between the full sync and the partial
sync.
## Fix
The fix is to adapt the behavior to the type of sync, by looking at the
presence of the sync cursor.
---------
Co-authored-by: Guillim <guillim@users.noreply.github.com>
