Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/526
(for reminder:
1. Make defaultRoleId non-nullable for an active workspace
2. Remove permissions V1 feature flag
3. Set member role as default role for new workspaces
About 1.:
An active workspace's defaultRoleId should never be null.
We can't rely on a simple postgres NOT NULL constraint as defaultRoleId
will always be initially null when the workspace is first created since
the roles do not exist at that time.
Let's add a more complex rule to ensure that
About 3.:
In the first phase of our deploy of permissions, we chose to assign
admin role to all existing users, not to break any existing behavior
with the introduction of the feature (= existing users have less rights
than before).
As we deploy permissions to all existing and future workspaces, let's
set the member role as default role for future workspaces.
)
Adding the possibility to change the view name and incon from the
Options menu dropdown
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11077
This PR fixes a bug where the actor source filter dropdown input was
showing on other field types filter dropdown input.
It just adds a check to show this particular actor source filter
dropdown input only if the field type is ACTOR.
Sub field name reset and lifecycle will be handled in the incoming work
on sub field filtering.
Updated the method to properly fetch and return workspace data with
related approved access domains. This ensures the correct handling of
workspace lookup and fixes potential issues with undefined returns.
Fix#10982
Fixes#10793
This PR is a work in progress.
**Still left to fix:**
- [x] When disabling synchronization of labels / api names, the edited
labels should be set to the English version. Currently the client just
send the localized versions together with the `isLabelSyncedWithName`
change. Could be an easy fix.
- [ ] Sometimes flipping the switch don't trigger the update function,
may be a regression as it seems to affect the custom objects too.
- [ ] There is a frontend problem where the labels inputs don't reflect
the changes made. When enabling back synchronisation after editing
labels, they are correctly back to their base values (backend,
navigation breadcrumb, etc) but the label inputs still have the old
values (switching pages will put them back to normal). I suspect this
could be linked to the above problem.
- [ ] API names are still displayed for standard objects per (kept them
for debugging, trivial fix)
- [ ] `SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm` have a `disableEdition`
parameter which is now used only for a few fields, not sure if it's
worth keeping because it's a bit misleading since it doesn't "disable"
much?
- [ ] I don't know what these do, but I have seen "Remote" object types.
Not sure if they work with my patch or not (I don't know how to test
them)
- [ ] Make it work with metadata synchronisation
**What should work:**
- Disabling synchronization of standard objects should work, label
inputs should no longer be disabled
- Modifying labels should work
- Enabling back synchronization should reset back the labels to the base
value and disable the label inputs again (minus the mentioned display
bug)
- The synchronisation switch should still work as expected for custom
objects
- Creating custom objects should still work (it uses the same form)
---------
Signed-off-by: AFCMS <afcm.contact@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
On default objects:
- Add see workflows
On workflows:
- Add see all runs (no selection)
On workflow runs:
- Add see workflows (no selection)
- Add see linked workflow (single record selection)
- Add see run version (single record selection)
On workflows versions
- Add see all runs (no selection)
- Add see workflows (no selection)
- Add see linked workflow (single record selection)
- Add see linked runs (single record selection)
Currently, when filling the form, values are not saved in the action
settings. This is an issue because we do not see the response in the
node settings, only in the output of the step.
This PR:
- adds a new endpoint to update a step in the run flow output
- updates this flow when a step is updated
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2e74a010-a0d2-4b87-bd1f-1c91f7ca6b60
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR is a first step towards isolating each filter dropdown use case,
here we isolate advanced filter field selection dropdown from view bar
filter field selection dropdown.
## Isolation of advanced filter field selection logic
We reimplement the previously generic logic into
AdvancedFilterFieldSelectMenu and AdvancedFilterSubFieldSelectMenu
components.
For now it contains duplicated code but, the end goal is to factorize
what's common to all object filter dropdowns in small hooks where
possible, at the end of the code path isolation first step, which will
be done for applyFilter and selectFilter logic that will be able to be
deleted after code path isolation.
A new component ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItemV2 has been
created to expose an onClick method instead of computing logic that
tries to guess where it is located, which allows to verticalize what
happens when we select a field in each specific use case, one layer
above.
Created the hook useSelectFieldUsedInAdvancedFilterDropdown which
contains the logic for field selection for advanced filter field select
dropdown specific use case, the first example of a good verticalized and
unique place to handle field selection in the context of advanced
filter.
The naming useAdvancedFilterDropdown was lying and is now
useAdvancedFilterFieldSelectDropdown which is now self-explanatory.
useAdvancedFilterFieldSelectDropdown has been removed from the main
object filter dropdown, thus isolating advanced filters field select
dropdown from the generic object filter field select dropdown.
## Miscellaneous
Removed states that were used in the generic filter dropdown to guess
whether it was in advanced filter context or not.
# Introduction
In this PR using the Ts AST dynamically compute what to export,
gathering non-runtime types and interface in an `export type`
[Export type TypeScript
documentation](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html)
From
```ts
// index.ts
export * from "submodule"
```
To
```ts
export type { SomeType } from "submodule";
export { SomeFunction, SomeConst } from "submodule";
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/644
## Motivations
- Most explicit and maintainable
- Best for tree-shaking
- Clear dependency tracking
- Prevents name collisions
## Important note
Please keep in mind that I will create, very soon, a dedicated
`generate-barrel` package in our yarn workspaces in order to:
- Make it reusable for twenty-ui
- Split in several files
- Setup lint + tsconfig
- Add tests
## Conclusion
As usual any suggestions are more than welcomed !
- Wrap the content of Workflow View, Workflow Edit, and Workflow Run
side panels with a container making them take all the available height
- Remove the `StyledContainer` of code steps as it's redundant with the
global container
- Add the WorkflowStepHeader to the input and output tabs
- Make the JSON visualizer take all the available height in input and
output tabs
- Reuse the WorkflowStepBody component in the input and output tabs as
it applies proper background color
## Demo
Fixes
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1351906809417568376
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
In this PR, I'm:
- fixing the root cause (we should not try to render a RecordChip if the
record is not defined in RelationFromMany Display)
- fixing related typing issues
- we won't be able to catch the issue from TS perspective as
ObjectRecord is a Record of string, any
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
## What
This PR aims to make sure all application exceptions are captured
through react-error-boundaries
Once merged we will have:
- Root Level: AppErrorBoundary at the highest level (full screen) ==>
this one needs to be working in any case, not relying on Theme, was not
working
- Route Level: AppErrorBoundary in DefaultLayout (full screen) ==> this
was missing and it seems that error are not propagated outside of the
router, making errors triggered in CommandMenu or NavigationDrawer
missing
- Page Level: AppErrorBoundary in DefaultLayout write around the Page
itself (lower than CommandMenu + NavigationDrawer)
- Manually triggered: example in ClientConfigProvider
## Screenshots
App level (ex throw in IconsProvider)
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18a14815-a203-4edf-b931-43068c3436ec"
/>
Route level (ex throw in CommandMenu)
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ca066627-14c7-438e-a432-f0999a1f3b84"
/>
Page level (ex throw in RecordTable)
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ffeaa935-02af-4762-8859-7a0ccf8b77e1"
/>
Manually Triggered (clientConfig, ex when backend is not up)
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/062d6d84-097a-4ed9-b6ce-763b8c27c659"
/>
- create a form filler component
- send the response on submit
- put back a field name. We need it for the step output
- validate a form is well set before activation
TODO:
- we need to refresh to see the form submitted. We need to discuss about
a strategy
- the response is not saved in the step settings. We need a new endpoint
to update workflow run step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f34a6cd-ed8c-4d9a-a1d4-51455cc83443
