We should not enqueue jobs "unmatch participants" with empty email.
This was done because of deleting persons while persons may have empty
emails
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13462
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13398
This bug was introduced by https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13215
The emails were empty in scenarios where the user wasn't authenticated
(reset passwords for instance) because in `hydrateGraphqlRequest` the
information about the locale was added only if the user was
authenticated `!this.isTokenPresent(request)`. So the locale was
undefined making ` i18n.activate(undefined) ` fail silently resulting in
an empty email.
# Why
If we have a Morph Relation, like :
Opportunity <-> Company & People
Let's say it's a MANY_TO_ONE on Opportunity side
Then we have two joinColumnNames looking like
- ownerPersonId
- ownerCompanyId
Let's say someone renames the obejct Person (assume we can even though
standard obejcts cannot be renames per say at the moment in the API)
We need to update the joinColumnName and create the associated
migrations
Webhooks are still documented in core playground to detail Webhooks of
core objects.
We moved webhooks to metadata playground and forgot to keep computation
of WebhookForResponse
This PR adds it back
This PR adds a public feature flag for search any field.
This feature flag default value has been set to false also to avoid
breaking the frontend, we'll wait for a sync metadata in the next
release on all workspace to remove this feature flag.
Duplicated the existing command `AddEnqueuedStatusToWorkflowRunCommand`.
Adding two steps:
- fetch the `workflowRun` object of the selected workspace
- using that object metadata id in the status field selection
- add to step output schema the information that field is a composite
sub field
- from output schema, when selecting the variable, copy all info
required to stepFilter
- from stepFilter, when selecting a value, display a special component
for composites
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13297
See SettingsDataModelFieldDateForm form validation which expects a
settings field to be present with a default display format. This PR adds
the missing initial value.
Context :
Large PR with 600+ test files. Enable connect and disconnect logic in
createMany (upsert true) / updateOne / updateMany resolvers
- Add disconnect logic
- Gather disconnect and connect logic -> called relation nested queries
- Move logic to query builder (insert and update one) with a preparation
step in .set/.values and an execution step in .execute
- Add integration tests
Test :
- Test API call on updateMany, updateOne, createMany (upsert:true) with
connect/disconnect
# Introduction
Created the runner metadata for the field and object
We should keep in mind that any runner handler will only iterate over an
atomic instance of entity ( object field index etc )
Never triggerring any side effect or whats over
In this way we will need to implement a deferred transaction, as for
when we create a relation we will inject to the first created field of
both the `relationTargetFieldMetadataId` deterministically computed
before its own creation
This would result in pg constraint brokage if not deferred
## Updates
- We decided gather create_fields under the create_object as they will
be building within the same sql query. This will ease both generation
and computation and avoid disassembling to reassemble afterwards
- Refactored FlatFieldMetadata to handle relation typing with flat
occurences
```ts
runCreateFieldSchemaMigration = async ({
action,
queryRunner,
}: WorkspaceMigrationActionRunnerArgs<CreateFieldAction>) => {
if (isFlatFieldMetadataEntityOfType(action.flatFieldMetadata, FieldMetadataType.RELATION)) {
action.flatFieldMetadata.flatRelationTargetObjectMetadata
}else {
action.flatFieldMetadata.flatRelationTargetObjectMetadata // tsc-error never
}
return;
};
```
## TODO
- ~~Discuss action signature with @Weiko in order to anticipate `schema`
runner needed grain~~
- ~~Refactor the object actions to contain picked `flatObjectMetadata`~~
- Implem index service
We will have floating steps in our workflow with the branch design.
Currently, a step without parent is considered linked to the trigger. We
need to distinguish the 2 cases. Thus this PR:
- add `nextStepIds` to workflowVersion.trigger
- create a command to migrate existing triggers
Should now properly match logical expressions like and(...), or(...)
instead of and/or without parenthesis, this should fix the issue with
fields that start with or/and
This PR adapts teh deleteOneField to make sure morph relations can be
deleted, either
- from a relation type,
- or from a morph relation type (which is the most obvious case).
This PR covers
- the deletion of fieldMetadata
- and the migrationof workspace schemas, by using the already existing
definition of relation migrations
This PR implements a new test suite: "Delete Object metadata with morph
relation" and completes the other test suites for FieldMetadata and
ObjectMetadata creation/deletion.
Last, we added a nitpick from @paul I forgot on a previous PR on
process-nested-realtion-v2
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1197
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This PR adds the ability to save an any field filter to a view.
It adds a new `anyFieldFilterValue` on both core view and workspace view
entities.
It also introduces the necessary utils that mimic the logic that manages
the save of record filters and record sorts on views.
Increment/Decrement methods were broken and were executing a SELECT
query while selecting twice the same table so the id column reference
was not precise enough. For some reason it didn't recognise the builder
as an update builder AND aliases were not parsed properly
I've modified the code to re-use the existing update method that is
correctly implemented-
BEFORE
```sql
query failed: SELECT entity FROM "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5"."viewField" "entity", "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5"."viewField" "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5.viewField" WHERE "id" IN ($1) -- PARAMETERS: ["cd665f5b-c3ce-44ec-a9b0-51a2d711287e"]
error: error: column reference "id" is ambiguous
```
AFTER
```sql
query: UPDATE "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5"."viewField" SET "position" = "position" + 1, "updatedAt" = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP WHERE "id" IN ($1) -- PARAMETERS: ["cd665f5b-c3ce-44ec-a9b0-51a2d711287e"]
```
### Summary
This PR fixes an inconsistency in the display of application versions in
the Admin Panel. Previously, the "Current version" was displayed with a
"v" prefix (e.g., `v1.1.1`), while the "Latest version" was displayed
without it (e.g., `1.1.1`).
### Problem
The inconsistency originated from two different data sources being
handled differently in the backend:
- `currentVersion` was read directly from the `APP_VERSION`
configuration variable, which includes the "v" prefix.
- `latestVersion` was fetched from the Docker Hub API, and the
`semver.coerce()` function was used to parse it, which strips the "v"
prefix.
### Solution
The fix addresses the root cause in the [AdminPanelService] on the
backend. The `semver.coerce()` function is now also applied to the
`currentVersion`.
This ensures that both version numbers are normalized at the data
source, providing a consistent format before being sent to the frontend.
This is a cleaner approach than manipulating the data on the client
side.
**Before:**
- Current version: `v1.1.1`
- Latest version: `1.1.1`
**After:**
- Current version: `1.1.1`
- Latest version: `1.1.1`
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
In this PR, behind a feature flag, we add a permission layer check based
on the read permission.
It is done by computing a map of an object's fields, where keys are the
column names and values the fieldMetadata id, making them comparable to
the restricted fields ids list stored in the permission cache.
For mutations (create, update, delete, destroy), we need to check the
read permission on the returned field, as they may differ from the
updated field. The write field permission will be tackled in a different
PR.
## Problem
After migrating webhooks and API keys from workspace to core level, REST
API endpoints were still creating entities in workspace schema
(`workspace_*`) instead of core schema, causing webhooks to not fire.
## Solution
- Added dedicated REST controllers for webhooks (`/rest/webhooks`) and
API keys (`/rest/apiKeys`)
- Updated dynamic controller to block workspace-gated entities from
being processed
- Fixed OpenAPI documentation to exclude these endpoints from playground
- Ensured return formats match GraphQL resolvers exactly
## Testing
✅ All endpoints tested with provided auth token - webhooks and API keys
now correctly stored in `core` schema
