In this PR:
- Adjust the edges to match the new Figma design
- Properly display the filters for workflows and workflow versions
(replaced shouldDisplayEdgeOptions with isEdgeEditable as we want to
display configured filters on workflow versions, but want to disallow
editing them)
- Wrote a few tests to make coverage pass
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d303d338-1938-4efe-b489-5a530d65fb30
Fixes
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/255?issue=twentyhq%7Ccore-team-issues%7C1214.
Until then, in the endpoints of our dynamic schema, we were querying all
columns and then formatting the result by removing the non-requested
fields (fields not mentioned in the graphql Query) from the result.
This is not compatible with field-level permissions that we are about to
introduce because users would see their request denied if they have
restricted rights on any of the fields of the objects they are querying,
even if they did not query it in the first place.
To prepare for this change, we are restricting the list of queried
columns to those made necessary by the graphql query.
I only made the changes in the dynamic schema for now. We will
potentially need to do updates to other part of the app that use
createQueryBuilder directly or not (for instance, when calling
repository methods such as .findOne()), but they mostly regard system
objects that are not subject to permissions or are executed by entities
that bypass permission such as jobs creating People and Companies from
their email sync.
No changes have been brought to existingRecords related logic in the
dynamic schema because @Weiko is currently working on it, so I may need
to adapt the new logic after he is done.
No feature flag have been added so far as this should not change
anything at the moment.
# Introduction
In this PR we initialize strictly typed services for both schema and
metadata migration runner.
Just scaffolding the file tree and services instances for incoming
parallel development with @Weiko
# Conclusion
Nothing is immuable here ! ( and might change in the future ) main goal
was to avoid upcoming conflicts and share same vision
As always any suggestion are more than welcomed !
This PR will create the migration to be run for the morph relations
- We created a dedicated util to generate the column name and refactored
a little the code in order to have less dependencies and a clearer devX
(updated the snapshot that changed because of this)
- Moved the `createMigrationActions` to its own util as well
- Created the `MorphRelationColumnActionFactory` based on the relation
one
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Context:
Users are complaining to see their workspace in a language they don't
know. This behavior is transient, happens on data model update and
disappear on refresh
I've check the cache for users that got the issue and did not spot any
weird language
==> I think we somehow fallback the the request header locale. I feel we
should always use the userWorkspace.locale, request locale should not be
used in BE in my opinion except for unauthenticated endpoints. I'm also
adding logs to understand the locale issue
In this PR:
rename user.workspaces into user.userWorkspaces which is more correct
improve / simplify LOCALES typing
This PR does not produce any functional changes for our users. It
prepares the branches for workflows by:
- decommissioning `output` and `context` fields or `workflowRun` records
and use newly created `state` field from front-end and back-end
- use `stepStatus` computed by `back-end` in `front-end`
- add utils and types in `twenty-shared/workflow` (not completed, a
follow-up is scheduled
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1211)
- add concurrency to `workflowQueue` message queue to avoid weird branch
execution when using forms in workflow branches
- add a WithLock decorator for better dev experience of
`CacheLockService.withLock` usage
Here is an example of such a workflow running (front branch display is
not yet done that's why it looks ugly) ->
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1258024460238192691/1392897615171158098
This PR refactors fields draft value component state and old component
scoped states still left.
It does not refactor the persistField logic but it will allow it in a
next refactor.
We still have to refactor scoped state used as component states / family
states, not as old states.
# Introduction
Introduced `EachTesting` pattern for the builder unit tests.
As always any suggestions are more than welcomed !
Still need to:
- [x] implem basic tests for field
- [x] create `get-flat-index-field-metadata.mock.ts`
- [x] Implement basic tests for index and index-fields
- [ ] Implem standard edges cases tests TDD style
## Misc
- was https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13132 closed due to mess
to rebase on main
resolve#12345
The issue was caused by the delete running after the update, which led
to both the old and new options being deleted when they shared the same
value.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
This PR fixes a focus conflict with global hotkeys, mainly "?" that
opens the shortcut helper dialog.
This fix works but we should maybe think about a more generic approach
in another issue, like disabling global hotkeys when certain types of
components are open (input, dropdown, etc.)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13197
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated trigger labels across various components to use lowercase
formatting for consistency. This includes changes in the
WorkflowVisualizerPage, DatabaseTriggerDefaultLabel, and other related
files. The adjustments enhance readability and maintain a uniform style
throughout the application.
---------
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
_(AI generated)_
### Summary
This PR fixes a validation bug in the GraphQL API that prevented
relation fields from being programmatically deactivated. The validation
was incorrectly triggering a "name cannot be changed" error even when
the update payload did not include a name, making it impossible to
disable the field.
Issue #13200
### Problem
- The [updateOneField] mutation failed when trying to set `isActive:
false` on a `RELATION` field.
- The root cause was a validation check in
[FieldMetadataValidationService] that compared the incoming `name` with
the existing one. If the input `name` was `undefined`, the check
`undefined !== existingName` would incorrectly fail.
- This created a catch-22 where a field could not be deleted (because it
had to be deactivated first) and could not be deactivated (due to this
validation error).
### Solution
- The validation logic in [field-metadata-validation.service.ts] has
been updated to only check for a name change if a new name is
**explicitly provided** in the input
(`isDefined(fieldMetadataInput.name)`).
- This change correctly enforces the rule that relation field names
cannot be changed, while allowing other properties like `isActive` to be
updated without issue.
### How to Test
1. Create a custom field of type `RELATION`.
2. Using the GraphQL API, call the [updateOneField] mutation with the
field's ID and the payload `{ "isActive": false }`.
3. Verify that the mutation succeeds and the field is now inactive.
4. Call the [deleteOneField] mutation to delete the field.
5. Verify that the deletion is successful.
### Additional Changes
_to be deleted if not necessary_
- Added a new integration test
[successful-field-metadata-relation-update.integration-spec.ts] to cover
this specific use case and prevent future regressions. The existing test
for failing updates remains untouched and continues to pass.
This PR refactors the snackbar modules that was using legacy versions of
our state management.
We replace the old states with new ones and also the old scoped context
with component instance context.
This PR improves dropdown menu headers for filter and sort dropdown in
view bar and editable filter chips.
It adds what's necessary to navigate back or close the dropdown, so that
we don't rely solely on click outside to exit the dropdown.
This PR also refactors the components so that we clearly identify the
two code paths that can use filter dropdowns : view bar and filter chip,
everything that can be DRY stays in the object-filter-dropdown module
but we try to have our wrapping components in each distinct module
instead of blending everything with ternaries inside
object-filter-dropdown module.
The vector search input value wasn't correctly handled across the
different dropdowns, due to a wrong component instance management, since
the dropdown menu header improvement put this into light, I also
refactored the state management of the vector search input.
@Bonapara please check the QA video and tell me if it's ok, I didn't add
dropdown menu header on the advanced filter field list dropdown because
it's a select more than a standalone dropdown, what do you think ?
QA :
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/17080f32-f302-436c-937b-3577715b7e84
QA Vector search fix :
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6367bbf6-8a98-4b53-86cf-6ba92be130eb
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/640
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1206
Instead of initializing model at start time we do it at run time to be
able to swap model provider more easily.
Also introduce a third driver for openai-compatible providers, which
among other allows for local models with Ollama
This PR fixes two bugs :
- Some important push item to focus stack calls were setting global
hotkey conflicting keys to true (like open dropdown)
- Icon picker matrix items were broken
Step operand will more or less be the same as view filter operand.
This PR:
- moves `ViewFilterOperand` to twenty-shared
- use it as step operand
- check what operand should be available based on the selected field
type in filter action
- rewrite the function that evaluates filters so it uses
ViewFilterOperand instead
ViewFilterOperand may be renamed in a future PR.
